compare SDSS and Hubble

• by liometopum

  here is a comparison of Hubble vs SDSS
  z(spectroscopic) = 0.1890

  skyserver.sdss.org/dr12/en/tools/chart/navi.aspx?ra=189.482045589298&dec=62.2518317538459&scale=0.2

  click here

  Posted April 7, 2015 3:19 AM

• by Budgieye moderator

  That is amazing. Here they are side by side for comparison, with magnification adjusted.

  
  

  http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr12/en/tools/explore/Summary.aspx?id=1237655369825845399

  http://talk.galaxyzoo.org/#/subjects/AGZ000823p

  ---

  Here are the image descriptions, I have to disable the commands slightly so that they don't actually work and you can see how the images are made.

  ---

  SDSS image

  

  remove space in http to make it work

  ---

  EDITED

  You can "steer" the image in SDSS. Here is an example. Substitute different ra, dec, scale, size. Remove the space in http to make it work, as I had to disable it so it wouldn't make an image.

  

  

  ---

  Hubble image

  IMG SRC="" WIDTH="300" >
  

  insert " less than" character at the beginning to make it work

  insert the image url between " "

  http://www.galaxyzoo.org.s3.amazonaws.com/subjects/standard/goods_full_n_30955_standard.jpg

  Posted April 7, 2015 8:11 AM

• by liometopum

  Here is another Hubble and SDSS match

  z(spectroscopic) = 0.5556. Interestingly, the photometric z given on DR12 is 0.552 ± 0.0433, which is really close to the spectroscopic z.

  This one is from Hubble:

  

  (I still cannot get the image to show!!) This one is from SDSS. A diffuse blob.

  http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr12/en/tools/chart/navi.aspx?ra=189.172919423879&dec=62.2341356244962&scale=0.2

  Posted April 8, 2015 7:06 PM

• by Budgieye moderator

  You can't copy from a SDSS Navigate page, not easily anyway.

  Do Navigate, Explore, Finding Chart, height and width 300, mag 0.04 and copy (right click works for me) from the image.

  Posted April 8, 2015 10:44 PM

• by Budgieye moderator

  

  http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr12/en/tools/explore/Summary.aspx?id=1237655369825780467

  What is the ID for the Hubble galaxy?

  11897

  Posted April 8, 2015 10:52 PM

• by liometopum

  Image AGZ0007zex is the Hubble ID used on Zooniverse

  Posted April 8, 2015 11:31 PM

• by liometopum

  Here is another Hubble and SDSS comparison.

  z(spectroscopic) = 1.0128

  Image AGZ0007zj9

  
  

  Posted April 9, 2015 12:04 AM

• by liometopum

  z(spectroscopic) = 0.4850

  Image AGZ000819r

  Hubble image left, SDSS image right

  
  

  Coordinates 189.3602941 62.3454923

  Posted April 9, 2015 5:10 AM

• by JeanTate

  These are spectacular images, thank you liometopum! 😃

  The "Hubble" in these images are those from the latest version/iteration of the Hubble Zoo, right? The one with the composite color mapping. Even though it's not chromatic, it does a remarkable job of displaying chromatic-like colors, yellow-ish for old stellar populations, blue-ish for star-forming regions, etc.

  Do you know what the image scale of the Hubble images is? My impression is that the whole Hubble image would almost fit in the 'blank space' between the ends of the reticule/cross-hairs. Also, with the image scale and the redshift, it would be fairly straight-forward to estimate the projected physical size of these galaxies, in kpc. Hmm ... maybe I'll have a go at that tomorrow ...

  Posted April 9, 2015 2:01 PM

• by Capella05 moderator

  

  AGZ0008109 || SDSS J123720.02+621632.3

  Posted April 9, 2015 5:47 PM

• by liometopum

  Image AGZ0007zeb

  SDSS top, Hubble below

  z(spectroscopic) 0.410

  
  

  Posted April 9, 2015 7:15 PM

• by liometopum in response to Capella05's comment.

  Hi Capella. I was hoping others would add to this collection. What I'd like to see is the spectroscopic redshift if available (and photometric if not). After a while we might be able to guess the distances. The one you posted (AGZ0008109) is z(spectroscopic) 0.4379

  These might serve as references to help ID SDSS fuzzy blobs too. For a long time, I wished I could see what those blobs looked like, and now we can.

  Posted April 9, 2015 7:23 PM

• by liometopum

  It is NOT there, or barely there. This is interesting because you can see where it should be, but it is too faint to show on the SDSS.
  Image AGZ0007yzf

  z(spectroscopic) = 0.9700 for the faint galaxy.

  z(spectroscopic) = 0.1363 for the larger, nearer galaxy

  
  

  ---

  THE OTHER GALAXY is z(spectroscopic) 0.1363 The Nearby Galaxy data

  Posted April 9, 2015 7:33 PM

• by Capella05 moderator in response to liometopum's comment.

  I am happy to post comparison images, but you need to be cautious about the accompanying redshifts.

  For the image I posted, the photometric redshift was anything from ~0.28 to ~0.84! That is a humongous difference! Also, with each survey the colour of the galaxies / objects will change (different colours are assigned to different filters), so it will be really difficult to compare / gauge distance just by looking at colour.

  Posted April 9, 2015 7:48 PM

• by liometopum in response to Capella05's comment.

  SIMBAD gives the spectroscopic redshift. In this case it is z(spectroscopic) 0.4379.
  http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=[BCW2008]+189.333588%2B62.27555

  SIMBAD also gives a chart of redshift measurements, and for this galaxy, all are close, except one probable aberrant.

  Redshift table

  In terms of caution, my worry is "did I get the right galaxy?". I use Aladin, and only go with a direct, exactly on the crosshairs, hit. I wish GZ would give us the GOODS number for the target galaxy, as that would help confirm it.

  Posted April 9, 2015 7:59 PM

• by liometopum

  Capella, one more thought... This is a lot of work, and I am tiring of it. So I don't want to encourage you to load comparisons, as it takes too much time. As things stand now, we can see how much better the Hubble images are, and see that an SDSS blob can be all sorts of things. Maybe this should be considered as 'job done'.

  Posted April 9, 2015 8:20 PM

• by Capella05 moderator in response to liometopum's comment.

  Capella, one more thought... This is a lot of work, and I am tiring of it. So I don't want to encourage you to load comparisons, as it takes too much time. As things stand now, we can see how much better the Hubble images are, and see that an SDSS blob can be all sorts of things. Maybe this should be considered as 'job done'.

  This is the Zooniverse - you do not have to do everything in one sitting! If we did we would all burn out 😃

  I think the comparison images in this thread are awesome - it gives us a perspective of the distance of the GOODS / CANDELS images we are currently classifying, compared to the SDSS ones.

  The dataset of this iteration of GZ is very small, so it will most likely be over in another two months (depending on the amount of classifications), just FYI 😃

  Posted April 9, 2015 8:35 PM

• by liometopum

  OK. Here is one that wtaskew found.

  Image AGZ0007xn7

  TKRS 1032 -- Galaxy or GOODS J123541.39+621217.8

  z(spectroscopic) 0.45862

  
  

  Posted April 9, 2015 11:57 PM

• by vrooje admin, scientist in response to Capella05's comment.

  I think the comparison images in this thread are awesome

  Me too! 😄

  Posted April 10, 2015 4:44 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ000829d

  z(spectroscopic) 0.52852

  
  

  Posted April 10, 2015 6:32 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007zx1

  z(spectroscopic) = 0.2530

  galaxy name is [BCW2008] 189.220123+62.30213 or TKRS 2974

  
  

  Posted April 10, 2015 7:49 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00080ug

  z(spectroscopic) 0.1063

  GOODS J123715.96+621158.9 or TKRS 10954

  
  

  Posted April 11, 2015 1:48 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007zgy

  z(spectroscopic) 0.5286

  [CCH2004] R 30340 or TKRS 9445

  
  

  Posted April 11, 2015 1:56 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00081bj

  z(~) 0.214

  name: CXOHDFN J123727.7+621034

  
  

  Posted April 11, 2015 2:15 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007zad

  z(spectroscopic) 0.8428

  name: [BCW2008] 189.162064+62.15099 or TKRS 9457

  
  

  Posted April 11, 2015 2:27 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007zsq

  z(spectroscopic) 0.4330

  GOODS J123650.21+620844.5

  
  

  Posted April 11, 2015 3:59 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0008061

  z(spectroscopic) 0.6770

  name: 2XMM J123658.8+621435 -- Seyfert 1 Galaxy or TKRS 6709

  
  

  Posted April 11, 2015 2:39 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007z6k

  z(spectroscopic) 0.0790

  name: MODS deep 1 or TKRS 6858

  
  

  Posted April 11, 2015 2:47 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00080vt

  z(spectroscopic) 0.411

  [CHB2000] O3716.82-1007.4

  
  

  Posted April 11, 2015 6:52 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007yzo

  z(spectroscopic) 0.5190

  name: PEARS 34967 or TKRS 6961

  
  

  Posted April 11, 2015 6:58 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ000821r

  z(~) 0.5111 (assumably photometric)

  name: TKRS 13718 or GOODS J123752.57+621449.4

  
  

  Posted April 11, 2015 9:28 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00081lz

  z(spectroscopic) 0.8530

  TKRS 11393 -- Seyfert 2 Galaxy

  
  

  Posted April 11, 2015 10:38 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00081kd

  z(spectroscopic) 0.8350

  name: MODS wide 10027 or TKRS 6281 or GOODS J123735.32+621918.2

  
  

  Posted April 12, 2015 1:21 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ000824j

  z(spectroscopic) 0.18913

  name: TKRS 9545 or GOODS J123757.06+621805.3

  
  

  Posted April 12, 2015 5:44 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007xnf

  z unknown

  name: unknown
  RA: 188.9252735, DEC: 62.1714323

  
  

  Posted April 12, 2015 6:01 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00080b5

  z(spectroscopic) 0.5120

  name: MODS deep 3607 or TKRS 7702

  
  

  note... you cannot see this galaxy at z=0.5

  Posted April 12, 2015 6:48 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ000822g

  In the SDSS image, we are cross-haired on the STAR. This is a very dim star, that you can barely see on SDSS. The adjacent barred spiral is not visible at all.

  star name: [BCW2008] 189.472992+62.28870 or TKRS 9778

  
  

  Posted April 12, 2015 7:20 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007zxo

  z(spectroscopic) 0.9380

  name: NAME SMM J123653+621119 -- Active Galaxy Nucleus or TKRS 9041

  The SDSS image in placed in invert. Is that barely visible item TKRS 9041 or an artifact? You decide.

  
  

  Posted April 12, 2015 8:55 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007zc7

  z(spectroscopic) 0.1369

  GNS 847 or TKRS 8794

  
  

  Posted April 12, 2015 9:02 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0008056

  z(spectroscopic) 0.1363

  name: MODS deep 2 or TKRS 10998

  
  

  Posted April 12, 2015 10:24 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007y0h

  The red blob slightly off center in the SDSS image is the elliptical galaxy visible in the Hubble image at top right corner

  z(spectroscopic) 0.8419

  name: [CBH2004] 189.019714+62.13688

  
  

  Posted April 13, 2015 5:33 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ000816r

  z(~) 0.2809 (assumably photometric)

  name: TKRS 2550 or GOODS J123724.34+622157.8

  
  

  Posted April 13, 2015 5:41 AM

• by liometopum

  Comparing DR6 to DR12 for image AGZ000816r

  name: TKRS 2550 or GOODS J123724.34+622157.8

  On the left is the image from DR6 (it says DR5). On right is what we pull up using DR12 . I noticed that wtaskew had looked at this galaxy also, using the SDSS finding chart, and posted in the comments that the SDSS image looked different from the Hubble image. This side-by-side comparison shows a difference in image quality between the two SDSS versions. That was a surprise to me.

  
  

  Posted April 13, 2015 5:53 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007yyh

  z(spectroscopic) 0.8447 is for [TEL2005] 1287 , the elliptical

  z(spectroscopic) 0.3207 is z for the galaxy slightly to right and up, which is TKRS 8399 or [CBH2004] 189.131699+62.15236

  The second, smaller elliptical apparently does not show up in the SDSS image and appears to be yet further away.

  Link to SIMBAD data for TEL2005 1287

  Link to SIMBAD data for TKRS 8399

  
  

  Posted April 13, 2015 2:37 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007z6j

  z(spectroscopic) 0.846 for targeted galaxy: GNS 1035

  z(spectroscopic) 0.9590 for the galaxy to the right, GNS 1034, or 2XMM J123636.6+621346 -- Seyfert 1 Galaxy

  GNS 1034 data link

  GNS 1035 data link

  
  

  Posted April 13, 2015 3:05 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00081s5

  z(spectroscopic) 0.0700

  name: [BCW2008] 189.426239+62.25509 or TKRS 10578

  SIMBAD data link

  
  

  Posted April 13, 2015 4:34 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00080rw

  z(spectroscopic) 0.5323

  name: MODS wide 10543 or TKRS 3129

  SIMBAD data link

  
  

  Posted April 13, 2015 5:15 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007y8z

  galaxy on left: z(spectroscopic) 0.2760 name: TKRS 4565 or MODS wide 1021

  galaxy on right: z(spectroscopic) 0.2755 name: MODS wide 959 Note: Active Galaxy Nucleus

  
  

  data link Left galaxy

  data link Right galaxy

  Posted April 13, 2015 6:41 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00081d6

  z(spectroscopic) 0.7846

  name: [TCC2005] 189.37094 +62.17753

  Comment: the scaling is not the same. The large galaxy in the SDSS image is not in the Hubble image.

  
  

  Data link

  Posted April 13, 2015 6:50 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007zkz

  z(spectroscopic) 0.4545

  name: TKRS 1711 or GOODS J123645.40+621901.3

  Data link

  
  

  189.1891478 62.3170282

  Posted April 13, 2015 11:48 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007xos

  This data is for the spiral galaxy near the top of the Hubble image.

  z(spectroscopic) 0.474

  name: [CBB2012] 1HERMES X1.4 J123545.51+620956.4

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 14, 2015 12:00 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007yhl

  main spiral: z(spectroscopic) 0.4734 name: MODS wide 1992

  the irregular galaxy to the left: z(spectroscopic) 0.6944 name: TKRS 4389 or MODS wide 2054

  spiral data link
  Irregular data link

  
  

  Posted April 14, 2015 12:12 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00081n6

  z(spectroscopic) 0.4522

  name: [CBH2004] 189.406631+62.37209

  data link

  The galaxy is just visible in the SDSS image.

  
  

  Posted April 14, 2015 1:33 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00080vt

  z(spectroscopic) 0.411

  name: TKRS 12931

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 14, 2015 4:58 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00081h1

  PhotoZ = 0.378 ± 0.0641 (no SIMBAD data)

  name: SDSS J123732.27+620933.7

  
  

  Posted April 14, 2015 10:04 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007yy3

  z(spectroscopic) 0.7837

  name: TKRS 2884 or MODS deep 2617

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 14, 2015 10:50 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007xos

  z(spectroscopic) 0.474

  name: [CBB2012] 1HERMES X1.4 J123545.51+620956.4

  
  

  Posted April 14, 2015 11:01 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007ydo

  one of the galaxies is GNS 2975 with z(spectroscopic) 0.5150
  SIMBAD does not appear to recognize the second galaxy.

  
  

  coordinates: 189.0704401 62.2437371

  Posted April 14, 2015 11:12 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0008275

  no spectroscopic Z data

  SDSS J123803.44+621806.2

  
  

  Posted April 15, 2015 5:02 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007xw3

  No spectroscopic z data

  the spiral, to right, off center, is [MOD2010] 1374 -- Radio-source.. For data on it, click here

  
  

  Posted April 15, 2015 5:28 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00081b4

  centered oblong blob:
  z(spectroscopic) 0.8620
  name: GOODS J123727.34+622106.7
  data link

  The large edge-on, to right:
  z(spectroscopic) 0.2800
  name: TKRS 4023
  data link

  
  

  Posted April 15, 2015 5:39 AM

• by Budgieye moderator

  Possbily the blue spiral arms are green in the SDSS image?

  

  http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr12/en/tools/explore/Summary.aspx?id=1237655369825845851

  http://talk.galaxyzoo.org/#/subjects/AGZ000826z
  SDSS J123803.13+621818.4

  Posted April 15, 2015 5:57 AM

• by c_cld

  #Spiral #starburst

  http://www.galaxyzoo.org/#/examine/AGZ0007yzq

  GDS_N_9120 1237655369825780300

  Posted April 15, 2015 3:08 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007zpo

  z(spectroscopic) 0.63481

  name: TKRS 12022
  data link

  
  

  Posted April 15, 2015 6:48 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007z6k

  z(spectroscopic) 0.0790

  name: TKRS 6858

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 15, 2015 8:20 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007xzu

  Unknown redshift. Galaxy not on SIMBAD

  
  

  Posted April 16, 2015 12:02 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007xo4

  z(spectroscopic) 0.55917

  name: TKRS 2090

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 16, 2015 5:27 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007zy1

  no Z data

  Note: on the SDSS image, you can see a faint red blob to lower left. Than must be the small galaxy visible in the Hubble image

  name: 2MASS J12365350+6206113 -- X-ray source
  data link

  
  

  Posted April 16, 2015 7:16 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007xvi

  z(spectroscopic) 0.45642

  name: TKRS 4732

  

  This higher magnification SDSS image shows the small elliptical beneath the target galaxy as a reddish blob.

  
  
  

  Posted April 16, 2015 7:25 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00081ua

  No Z data
  One of those galaxies is [MOD2010] 1052 -- Radio-source

  
  
  

  Posted April 16, 2015 8:41 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007yzq

  z(spectroscopic) 0.4370

  name: TKRS 2033

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 17, 2015 12:36 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00081eh

  z(spectroscopic) 0.63383

  name: TKRS 4783

  data link

  
  
  

  Posted April 17, 2015 12:41 AM

• by liometopum

  Image AGZ0007y65

  z(spectroscopic) 0.1360

  TKRS 3583

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 17, 2015 6:22 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00081vb

  z(spectroscopic) 0.61

  name: PEARS 120896 -- Emission-line galaxy

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 17, 2015 6:28 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00081kz

  Target galaxy:
  z(spectroscopic) 0.2990 name TKRS 7324 data link

  ---

  Spiral below: z(~) 0.634 name: CXOHDFN J123735.9+621805 -- Seyfert 2 Galaxy

  
  

  Posted April 17, 2015 3:19 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007zxo

  z(spectroscopic) 0.9380

  name: TKRS 9041

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 17, 2015 3:29 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007xxm

  z(spectroscopic) 0.29846

  name: TKRS 444

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 17, 2015 6:21 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007zit

  target galaxy is z(spectroscopic) 0.5571 name: MODS deep 1335 data link 1335

  lower left galaxy: z(spectroscopic) 0.555 name: MODS deep 1344data link 1344

  
  

  Posted April 18, 2015 1:03 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00080ug

  z(spectroscopic) 0.1063

  name: TKRS 10954

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 18, 2015 1:10 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007zeb

  target galaxy: z(spectroscopic) 0.410 name: GNS 887 data link GNS 887

  left galaxy: z(spectroscopic) 0.5190 name: GNS 888 -- Seyfert 2 Galaxy data link GNS 888

  
  

  Posted April 18, 2015 1:18 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007ym5

  z(spectroscopic) 0.6390
  name: TKRS 2227

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 18, 2015 1:23 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007yx9

  z(spectroscopic) 0.2953

  name: TKRS 6986

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 18, 2015 1:26 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007zsr

  z(spectroscopic) 0.474

  name: TKRS 7557

  dta link

  
  

  Posted April 18, 2015 3:19 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00080gt

  z(~) 0.3303

  TKRS 1335

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 18, 2015 9:03 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007zat

  z(spectroscopic) 0.6358

  TKRS 8429

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 18, 2015 9:07 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007yxw

  z(spectroscopic) 1.013

  name: TKRS 6673

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 18, 2015 9:12 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007y3u

  z(spectroscopic) 0.4090

  TKRS 6586

  
  

  Posted April 18, 2015 9:17 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ000812j

  z(~) 0.104

  data link

  SDSS image scaled out to show entire spiral galaxy

  
  
  

  Posted April 18, 2015 9:21 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007xv8

  z(spectroscopic) 0.6380

  TKRS 3829

  
  

  Posted April 18, 2015 11:22 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0008059

  z(spectroscopic) 0.457

  TKRS 5621

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 19, 2015 6:51 AM

• by Budgieye moderator

  You can "steer" the image in SDSS. Here is an example. Substitute different ra, dec, scale, size. Remove the space in http to make it work, as I had to disable it so it wouldn't make an image.

  

  

  Posted April 19, 2015 7:05 AM

• by c_cld

  same but zoomed out

  http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr12/en/tools/explore/summary.aspx?ra=189.3385221&dec=62.2132066

  

  1237655464306475119 ; http://talk.galaxyzoo.org/#/subjects/AGZ0008123

  Posted April 19, 2015 12:53 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00081ez

  z(~) 0.298 (probably photometric)

  CXOHDFN J123730.6+620943

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 19, 2015 7:35 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00081id

  z(spectroscopic) 0.1050

  TKRS 11280

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 20, 2015 1:21 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007xpv

  z(spectroscopic) 0.0787

  TKRS 1808

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 20, 2015 1:28 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007xxh

  z(spectroscopic) 0.50707

  TKRS 5511

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 20, 2015 1:32 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007zi8

  z(spectroscopic) 0.7507

  TKRS 7057

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 20, 2015 3:02 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007yx9

  z(spectroscopic) 0.2953

  TKRS 6986

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 20, 2015 3:07 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ000824m

  z(spectroscopic) 0.4578

  TKRS 12293

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 20, 2015 8:24 PM

• by liometopum

  AGZ0007xnk

  z(spectroscopic) 0.2266

  [CBH2004] 188.925873+62.16058 -- Galaxy

  data link

  
  

  Posted April 22, 2015 12:36 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ000828c

  
  

  Posted April 22, 2015 12:46 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00081uq

  
  

  Posted April 22, 2015 12:52 AM

• by liometopum

  AGZ00080rb

  
  

  Posted April 22, 2015 12:58 AM