Unreported supernova #SNe
-
by c_cld
587742615099342872 green #SNe
DR5
DR12 no longer photometric object
#SNe unseen in DSS and unrecorded in Vizier š
Posted
-
by c_cld
Blue #SNe close to host 1237680332707070435 PGC 1828732
host on Mjd-Date 10/18/2009
unseen in DSS and unrecorded in Vizier
Posted
-
by Ghost_Sheep_SWR in response to c_cld's comment.
DECaLS* nothing to be seen (good signs), except small dark spots?
http://imagine.legacysurvey.org/?ra=241.6959&dec=14.0821&zoom=16&layer=decals-
http://imagine.legacysurvey.org/?ra=342.1996&dec=28.1864&zoom=16&layer=decals-dr1jPosted
-
by Budgieye moderator
see https://talk.galaxyzoo.org/#/boards/BGZ0000005/discussions/DGZ0001xo1?page=1&comment_id=5714b3d6861f892cd60003cf #unreportedsupernova
Posted
-
by c_cld
Unreported #SNe Source RA,Dec = 229.8220, 14.3364
Source type: P
Mags: g=19.74, r=19.53, z=20.46
Brick: 2298p142DR2 cutout
FILTERX = 'g '
DATEOBS1= '2015-03-29T07:42:15.944' / DATE-OBS for the first image in the stack
DATEOBS2= '2015-04-17T06:27:18.098' / DATE-OBS for the last image in the stack
FILTERX = 'r '
DATEOBS1= '2015-03-29T07:43:56.917' / DATE-OBS for the first image in the stack
DATEOBS2= '2015-04-17T06:25:45.499' / DATE-OBS for the last image in the stack
AGZ000brgf
1237668271910093081Posted
-
by c_cld
Unreported #SNe Source RA,Dec = 199.50812 -01.69117 13:18:01.94 -01:41:28.2
DR2 cutout
FILTERX = 'g '
DATEOBS1= '2015-03-28T05:49:35.905' / DATE-OBS for the first image in the stack
DATEOBS2= '2015-03-28T05:58:50.609' / DATE-OBS for the last image in the stack
FILTERX = 'r '
DATEOBS1= '2015-03-28T05:47:21.020' / DATE-OBS for the first image in the stack
DATEOBS2= '2015-03-28T05:56:33.728' / DATE-OBS for the last image in the stack
AGZ000bjgw 1237655499736351131
Posted
-
by c_cld
Unreported #SNe or other transient Source #asteroid? RA,Dec = 154.83783 +28.68886 10:19:21.08 +28:41:19.9
DR2 cutout
FILTERX = 'r '
DATEOBS1= '2014-12-31T08:06:39.579' / DATE-OBS for the first image in the stack
DATEOBS2= '2014-12-31T08:06:39.579' / DATE-OBS for the last image in the stack
FILTERX = 'g '
DATEOBS1= '2014-12-31T08:13:19.260' / DATE-OBS for the first image in the stack
DATEOBS2= '2014-12-31T08:13:19.260' / DATE-OBS for the last image in the stack
AGZ000c1f7 1237665368501977185
Posted
-
by Ghost_Sheep_SWR in response to c_cld's comment.
AGZ000c1f7, object r mag=20.5 g mag=21.9
DECaLS DR2 Models looks incradibly like an asteroid to me, blue-green / no red,
Might be one of two asteroids in the area with little observational data and condition code 9:
orbit uncertainty estimate 0-9, with 0 being good, and 9 being highly uncertainhttp://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbfind.cgi#results
Closest in arcsecs and magnitude:
Main-belt asteroid 2010 MZ10, mag 20, center norm 1451 (s), # observations used: 23, condition code 9
http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=2010 MZ10
Nearby: Outer Main-belt asteroid 2010 PX37, mag 18, center norm 3497 (s), # observations used: 9, condition code 9
http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=2010 PX37Posted
-
by c_cld
Unreported #SNe Source RA,Dec = 229.77578 3.0199 15 19 06.19 03 01 11.6
Source type: P
Mags: g=18.62, r=20.46, z=20.03
Brick: 2298p030DR2 cutout
FILTERX = 'g '
DATEOBS1= '2015-03-28T07:59:28.181' / DATE-OBS for the first image in the stack
DATEOBS2= '2015-03-28T07:59:28.181' / DATE-OBS for the last image in the stack
FILTERX = 'r '
DATEOBS1= '2014-08-13T00:19:51.338' / DATE-OBS for the first image in the stack
DATEOBS2= '2015-03-28T07:57:48.649' / DATE-OBS for the last image in the stack
AGZ000cih3 1237654879669780739
Posted
-
by c_cld
Unreported #SNe Source RA,Dec = 209.49816 +11.84758 in AGZ000cat4
DR2 cutout
FILTERX = 'g '
DATEOBS1= '2015-03-29T06:13:40.721' / DATE-OBS for the first image in the stack
DATEOBS2= '2015-03-29T06:24:19.696' / DATE-OBS for the last image in the stack
FILTERX = 'r '
DATEOBS1= '2015-03-29T06:15:14.383' / DATE-OBS for the first image in the stack
DATEOBS2= '2015-03-29T06:22:52.299' / DATE-OBS for the last image in the stack
Posted
-
by c_cld
AGZ000c3qi in discussion Foreground star ? unreported supernova
Posted
-
by Budgieye moderator
supernova or cosmic ray hit? nothing on SDSS
https://talk.galaxyzoo.org/#/subjects/AGZ000c03x
Posted
-
AGZ000c04a / UGC 6207, in SDSS not in the central galaxy of the pair.
http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr9/en/tools/chart/navi.asp?ra=167.47612&dec=24.2572
There is a reference of a supernova in this galaxy as indicated by Budgieye, but has different coordinates; ra=167.47861&dec=24.25790
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/bib_query?2011MNRAS.412.1419L
Link to online data from the article, go |online data|
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011yCat..74121419LPosted
-
AGZ000bikp, RA=233.5158 Dec=2.2143 in DECaLS DR2
Doesn't look perfectly round and extremely bright though.
http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr9/en/tools/explore/obj.asp?ra=233.51609920328838&dec=2.2105237633140087
http://legacysurvey.org/viewer?ra=233.5158&dec=2.2143&zoom=16&layer=decals-dr2
Posted
-
AGZ000d27z, ra=31.7126 dec=14.7246
Host IC 1780
Strangely it is rather white instead of blue or green...
Can only find one SN reference but it is from 2016-09-05 and closer to nucleus; SN 2016fts
https://wis-tns.weizmann.ac.il/object/2016fts
SDSS DR6
http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr6/en/tools/explore/obj.asp?id=587724234257465503
SDSS DR9Mjd-Date 12/06/2005
http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr9/en/tools/explore/obj.asp?id=1237670961618419984
DECaLS DR3
http://legacysurvey.org/viewer?ra=31.7126&dec=14.7247&zoom=16&layer=decals-dr3
Posted
-
AGZ000bme4 RA= 228.3101 Dec= 4.2861.
Host IC 1105
SDSS
DECaLS DR2
DECaLS DR3
http://legacysurvey.org/viewer?ra=228.3101&dec=4.2861&zoom=16&layer=decals-dr2
PanSTARRS
Posted
-
AGZ000d955 RA Dec 341.53017 -10.36779
Host IC 1451 z=0.03024
SDSS DR5
SDSS DR9
http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr13/en/tools/explore/Summary.aspx?id=1237656536978161754
PanSTARRS
Posted
-
AGZ000dbi0
RA Dec 14.34612169 14.32638195AT 2000gc
https://wis-tns.weizmann.ac.il/object/2000gcPosted
-
AGZ000d38e RA Dec 21.59063507 -1.27439916
AT 2000gd https://wis-tns.weizmann.ac.il/object/2000gd
Odd colours for a supernova
https://talk.galaxyzoo.org/?_ga=1.244656832.476670387.1443719759#/subjects/AGZ000d38e
Posted
-
by BioMiep
Possible supernova. I don't know how to get a GalaxyZoo ID but here is the picture. AGZ000CU1U
Posted
-
by Budgieye moderator
Follow up on by BioMiep's discussion. Small green transient, not present in PanSTARRS image, (not in DECaLS footprint.)
SDSS dr9
http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr9/en/tools/explore/obj.asp?ra=339.5894822289839&dec=8.610270997842564
https://talk.galaxyzoo.org/#/subjects/AGZ000cu1u found by BioMiep
PanSTARRS
Well, these temporary AGZ links can go out of date, leaving us with no link.. At least put in the co-ordinates. A picture is nice too.
There is posting information in the Featured Discussion in the left column in Recent page.
#3 How do I: All your FAQ's - Includes a GZ Glossary https://talk.galaxyzoo.org/#/boards/BGZ0000005/discussions/DGZ0000utn
#1 How do I : Find out more information about the galaxy I have classified?https://talk.galaxyzoo.org/#/boards/BGZ0000005/discussions/DGZ0000lv2
Posted
-
by BioMiep
Thank you. I will look into how to post them correctly next time i find something. I have zero forum experience.
Posted
-
by Budgieye moderator
http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr9/en/tools/explore/obj.asp?ra=195.7742&dec=25.47537
https://talk.galaxyzoo.org/#/subjects/AGZ000elgp
Posted
-
AGZ000emmc by luciaderrico
Transient unreported in the Transient Name Server, not in PanSTARRS1. Unfortunately not in DECaLS and only one available SDSS field image. Host galaxy might be at z=0.037 with transient SDSS r mag 17.76 so looks very bright, superluminous possible?
SDSS DR13
PanSTARRS1Posted
-
by c_cld
Unreported SN supernova candidate from the SDSS-DR13 spectral BOSS survey
SDSS J052226.90+003835.6 1237646587710013714 RA, Dec 80.612115284, 0.643241136
Host
Spectrum plate 7261 mjd 56603 fiberID 323 on
2013-11-07![8175248119929114624](http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr13/en/get/SpecById.ashx?id=8175248119929114624 =609x435) wrong mapping lines
looks similar to spectra of SN Ic : see https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.07124 The Spectral SN-GRB Connection: Systematic Spectral Comparisons between Type Ic Supernovae, and broad-lined Type Ic Supernovae with and without Gamma-Ray Bursts,From: Maryam Modjaz 29 Jul 2016
Posted
-
by Budgieye moderator in response to c_cld's comment.
It reminds me of some of the quenched quasars. BAL Fe , I can't find the reference right now.
QSO absorption systems; Absorbers by c_cld.http://www.galaxyzooforum.org/index.php?topic=279723.msg573127#msg573127
or carbon star
THE UNUSUAL SPITZER SPECTRUM OF THE CARBON STAR IRAS 04496 http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/507178/pdf;jsessionid=230CA80B305CDFF28C5CE98840320355.c3.iopscience.cld.iop.org
Posted
-
by c_cld
What about these other spectra sample: Are they SNe spectra with wrong mapping lines ?
SDSS J052229.67+005402.2 1237658188923667332 RA, Dec 80.623660711, 0.900629896
Spectrum plate 7261 mjd 56603 fiberID 338 on 2013-11-07
SDSS J052301.81+005320.4 1237658188923667519 RA, Dec 80.757546153, 0.889024113
Spectrum plate 7261 mjd 56603 fiberID 335 on 2013-11-07
![enter image description here](http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr13/en/get/SpecById.ashx?id=8175251418463997952 =609x435)
How strange on RA ~ 80 that these three galaxies are separated by 8' and 17' : mere chance or cause and effect explosion around same time? Is it too speculative?
SDSS J233851.27+060817.6 1237669516365791545 RA, Dec 354.713642795, 6.138237333
Spectrum plate 4407 mjd 55884 fiberID 960 on 2011-11-19
Posted
-
by mlpeck in response to c_cld's comment.
In the first spectrum from the previous post that looks like HĪ±+[N II] at ā¼7270-7320Ć , which would make the redshift right around z=0.11. The apparent emission feature just to the right is the [S II] doublet, and it's in the right place. HĪ² might be visible in emission at 5400Ć . I have no idea what's causing the other features, but I think the galaxy redshift is secure.
In the third spectrum the apparent emission around 8150-8170Ć could again be HĪ±+[N II], which would make the redshift zā0.24. From that you can identify NaD at ā¼7300Ć , Mg I at ā¼6400Ć and the 4000Ć break around 4900Ć . Overall it looks like an ETG spectrum, maybe contaminated by a late type foreground star (just guessing about that)?
Couldn't even begin to guess what the middle spectrum is from.
Posted
-
by c_cld
@mlpeck You are right in finding emission/absorptions lines in spectra according to the contamination of the supernova by its host galaxy after the luminosity peak of the explosion.
Many searches have been carried out for detection of supernovae in SDSS galaxy spectra;
see Spectroscopic detection of Type Ia Supernovae in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey arXiv:astro-ph/0310887 From: Darren S. Madgwick et al., 3 Nov 2003
or last The weirdest SDSS galaxies: results from an outlier detection algorithm arXiv:1611.07526 From: Dalya Baron et al., 22 Nov 2016
and my GZ posts http://www.galaxyzooforum.org/index.php?topic=279846.0
The spectrum plate 7261 mjd 56603 fiberID 335 has for me the look of
PTF11kx after Day 11 in paper On the Nature of Type Ia-CSM Supernovae: Optical and Near-Infrared Spectra of SN 2012ca and SN 2013dn arXiv:1408.6239 From: Ori Fox et al., 26 Aug 2014
with CAII lines over the bump of called CIV in SDSS spectrum.
In short:
need of background galaxy spectrum and SNe templates to get residuals for improving fitting pipelines.
Posted
-
by c_cld
Tentative Mapping lines of SDSS J052301.81+005320.4 1237658188923667519 RA, Dec 80.757546153, 0.889024113
My redshift estimate is 0.3475 at the upper limit of photoZ 0.295 Ā± 0.0526. Vertical lines highlight several of the more prominent features marked in checkboxes.
Posted
-
by c_cld
Unreported SN supernova candidate
SDSS J151432.92+013046.1 1237655468599017735 on mjd 52052 = 05/23/2001
DECaLS cutout
Posted
-
by zoob1172
DR3 DR9
1237679253600600262
WISE W1/W2 and DR9
1237678663045546124
DR2 DR9
1237668311623729344Another ... from 23.05.2017
1237654604778307830 DR2, DR3 (same)
and DR13http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr13/en/tools/explore/Summary.aspx?id=1237666227514311130
http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr9/en/tools/explore/obj.asp?id=1237669517437305008
Posted
-
by CeciliaB
AGZ000d52v RA Dec 4.75159 19.39983
Posted
-
by Budgieye moderator
After some staring, I think it is not bright enough to be lensed quasar, even though lots of dust that might quench the light. I think foreground stars, and one #unreported_supernova , the green star.
http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr9/en/tools/explore/obj.asp?ra=352.87912524761356&dec=10.080168323361676
Posted
-
by Budgieye moderator
Found while browsing in UNWISE , the host galaxy is bright in IR http://legacysurvey.org/viewer?ra=194.8769&dec=40.6010&zoom=14&layer=unwise-w1w2
SDSS J125930.47+403606.3 http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr12/en/tools/explore/Summary.aspx?id=1237662226218287138
SDSS J125930.92+403607.2 http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr12/en/tools/explore/Summary.aspx?id=1237662226218287139
DECaLS
http://legacysurvey.org/viewer/jpeg-cutout/?ra=194.8769&dec=40.6012&zoom=14&layer=mzls+bass-dr4
Posted
-
by Ghost_Sheep_SWR in response to Budgieye's comment.
Nice find!
Looks like a perfect unreported transient / supernova candidate to me. Visible in all bands in SDSS, strongest in g band, and not in other surveys or TNS.
Want to report it? It is a photometric object in SDSS so no trouble with magnitudes.
Posted
-
by Budgieye moderator
SNF 20050927-008 seen by josefajardo verified by Ghost_Sheep_SWR
https://talk.galaxyzoo.org/#/subjects/AGZ000d1db
Talk search
1237670016198312064
1237670016198312065
J025629.06+061139.4
587744294973407342
Forum search
1237670016198312064
J025629.06+061139.4
http://cas.sdss.org/dr7/en/tools/explore/obj.asp?id=587744294973407342
587744294973407342
http://cas.sdss.org/dr7/en/tools/explore/obj.asp?id=587744294973407341
Possible SN finds http://www.galaxyzooforum.org/index.php?topic=280866.75
Doesn't seem to be anyone else noticed it, though it is had to be sure.
Posted
-
by Budgieye moderator in response to Ghost_Sheep_SWR's comment.
Yes, please report any of these to the International Astronomical Union, sending person a pm, first, giving due credit. If it is on SDSS, you may have to check the forum to see if anyone else noticed it , I can help with that.
https://www.iau.org/public/themes/discoveries/ . Is that why you needed magnitudes of stars?
Looking for anyone who saw it first., nobody reported it in Talk and Forum.
Various ID s
SDSS J125930.92+403607.2
http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr12/en/tools/explore/Summary.aspx?id=1237662226218287138 posted as a radio source by c_cld http://www.galaxyzooforum.org/index.php?topic=8905.msg652929#msg652929
1237662226218287138
http://skyserver.sdss.org/dr12/en/tools/explore/Summary.aspx?id=
1237662226218287139
http://cas.sdss.org/dr7/en/tools/explore/obj.asp?id=588017979970093089 galaxy posted as a radio source by Tsering http://www.galaxyzooforum.org/index.php?topic=8905.msg337940#msg337940
588017979970093089
http://cas.sdss.org/dr7/en/tools/explore/obj.asp?id=588017979970093090 blue
588017979970093090
matching size of SDSS and DECaLS
Posted
-
by Ghost_Sheep_SWR in response to Budgieye's comment.
It seems there are many supernova hunter teams that don't necessarily report their findings to the Transient Name Server but only in an Astronomers Telegram (ATel) or paper.
So to be sure it isn't a known transient / supernova it is necessary to search the TNS, NED, SIMBAD, VizieR, The supernova pages, IAU Search, ADS and google on combinations of: ATel, coordinates, host galaxy name, supernova etc.
So since SNF 20050927-008 is published in a paper by the Nearby Supernova Factory and is in SIMBAD it can be regarded as reported / discovered already. No need to submit as transient to the TNS in this case.
Posted
-
by Ghost_Sheep_SWR in response to Budgieye's comment.
Some thoughts:
https://www.iau.org/public/themes/discoveries/ . Is that why you
needed magnitudes of stars?No, I've found an unreported transient for which I think I can create a light-curve to determine type. To do so I must determine the magnitudes from each image from FITS files. If I'm successfull I might be able to get an official supernova classification. But nonetheless very strange that this IAU page doesn't provide a link to the TNS site, which states it's officially the IAU transient report page.....
I'm a bit reluctant to report transient found by others with regards to first discovery, proper crediting etc. etc. Really need to be sure who was first, permission to report + with what name they want it reported. Also I'm quite sure zooites like c_cld and planetaryscience are very well capable of submitting their own transient finds at the TNS, I'll won't touch those š
Also takes quite some time to search for all the info + checking if it is an -unreported -real transient, together with other stuff I'm doing might take some time to submit several (apart from finding out who first mentioned the object).
As said I don't master the art of establishing a magnitude from scratch yet, so the object has to be a photometric object eg survey must provide magnitudes or else I can't really submit.
So tl:dr I'm convinced your transient in host galaxy IC 3993 is an unreported real transient and submittable, I'll pm you š š
Posted
-
by Ghost_Sheep_SWR in response to Budgieye's comment.
Congratulations, here is the report of AT 2003mb!! š
https://wis-tns.weizmann.ac.il/object/2003mb
Posted
-
by c_cld in response to Ghost_Sheep_SWR's comment.
Three more very old transients you could report after your argument of having records of hosting galaxies on https://wis-tns.weizmann.ac.il/:
SDSS J120016.90+050436.4 1237671127517823012 180.070451601, 5.076795567
SDSS J110736.81+012928.9 1237654028715950203 166.903414879, 1.491362806
SDSS J161624.68+510315.4 1237668611197305063 244.102854890, 51.054279251
I don't mind not to be mentionned as "observer/discover"!
Posted
-
by Ghost_Sheep_SWR in response to c_cld's comment.
That's cool! edit everyone is free to choose if they want to be mentioned or not ofcourse š Guess there aren't GZ ID's associated with them.
Not sure what you mean with records of host galaxies? For me the host galaxy is not important for reporting, mainly first poster for credits and magnitudes given by the survey š
Thanks
Posted
-
by Budgieye moderator
Thank you Ghost_Sheep_SWR for doing this work.
Posted
-
by Ghost_Sheep_SWR in response to Ghost_Sheep_SWR's comment.
@Budgieye: My pleasure š
But nonetheless very strange that this IAU page doesn't provide a
link to the TNS site, which states it's officially the IAU transient
report page.....Response from the IAU:
Dear A F Jonkeren,
The TNS is the only official tool. Use of CBAT for transients has been
discontinued on Jan 1 2016 and the link mentioned should be removed.
We will update the theme page you mentioned. Thanks for pointing out
this.Best Regards, Sze-leung
So that's settled then š
Posted
-
New transient reports, citizen scientists FTW! š
SDSS J161624.68+510315.4 is now AT 2005nf https://wis-tns.weizmann.ac.il/object/2005nf
SDSS J110736.81+012928.9 is now AT 2000gf https://wis-tns.weizmann.ac.il/object/2000gf
SDSS J004747.30-092242.2 is now AT 2000ge https://wis-tns.weizmann.ac.il/object/2000ge
If anyone wants their named changed or thinks it should be added just let me know, I can add a comment in the TNS object page to rectify.
Perhaps if this one could be checked for prior comments in Galaxy Zoo / old forum, it looks like a good unreported transient so far. I've posted it on page 3 of this thread.
AGZ000emmc first comment by @luciaderrico
Posted
-
https://talk.galaxyzoo.org/?_ga=1.191070186.1751955194.1484309494#/subjects/AGZ000e3oq
RA: 184.58735 DEC: 1.69244
bluemagi hughdickinson Budgieye leeskelvin
https://talk.galaxyzoo.org/?_ga=1.191070186.1751955194.1484309494#/subjects/AGZ000e07p
RA: 175.14928 DEC: 0.85451
georgem571 karthikeyan.d Budgieye
Posted
-
Posted by me
Only visible in VSTKIDS g band, not in other bands and not present in SDSS, PanSTARRS1, DECaLS or VIKING images. No Transient or Supernova reports.
GZ subject image
VSTKIDS gri image
Posted by Reverendbeer, Budgieye and CeciliaB.
Not so sure about this one. Really strong (extended source?) detection in VSTKIDS g band,and at first glance not in other bands / surveys. But perhaps there is a weak detection in VSTKIDS r band, and also SDSS g band + PanSTARRS seem to hint at a weak source.
Best guess now would not be a transient, but very weak source only emitting at confined wavelenghts (g band)?
GZ subject image
VSTKIDS gri
PS1 y/i/g
You can see the possoble faint detection in SDSS g band here in IRSA FINDER CHART.
Posted by IP0nderz and Budgieye
Only faintly visible in VSTKIDS r band, I don't understand why it's so pronounced in the GZ subject image. Not present in other bands or surveys.
VSTKIDS gri
Posted
-
by c_cld
Transient 1237660669820207229 unreported
field image taken on mjd_r = 52622.49869681 i.e. 2002-12-14 11:58:07 UTC
north of QSO 1237660669820207228
decals-dr5 centered on QSO (no transient)
Posted
-
by c_cld
Transient 1237662335179817118 unreported
field image taken on mjd_r= 52760.29515585 i.e. 2003-05-01 07:05:01 UTC
PanSTARRS-1 stack y/i/g (15.00 arcsec)
Posted
-
by c_cld in response to Ghost_Sheep_SWR's comment.
https://talk.galaxyzoo.org/#/subjects/AGZ000e07p
yellow blob seen only in r filter
dataset: http://ds.astro.rug.astro-wise.org:8000/KiDS_DR3.0_175.0_0.5_r_sci.fitsheader same as http://archive.eso.org/hdr?DpId=ADP.2016-10-05T16:53:15.073
TELESCOP= 'ESO-VST ' / ESO Telescope designation INSTRUME= 'OMEGACAM' / Instrument name FILTER = 'r_SDSS ' / Filter name OBJECT = 'KIDS_175.0_0.5' / Target designation MJD-OBS = 56388.16102411 / Start of observations (days) MJD-END = 56388.183871261 / End of observations (days) DATE-OBS= '2013-04-06T03:51:52.483' / Date the observation was started (UTC) PROV1 = 'OMEGA.2013-04-06T03:51:52.483.fits' / Originating science file PROV2 = 'OMEGA.2013-04-06T03:58:36.006.fits' / Originating science file PROV3 = 'OMEGA.2013-04-06T04:05:19.435.fits' / Originating science file PROV4 = 'OMEGA.2013-04-06T04:12:02.816.fits' / Originating science file PROV5 = 'OMEGA.2013-04-06T04:18:46.477.fits' / Originating science file
giving the 5 coadds observations starts.
Posted
-
by Ghost_Sheep_SWR in response to c_cld's comment.
Yes I knew about only in r band, but couldn't fix an obsdate to it thanks! BUT, also visible in DECaLS, please see https://talk.galaxyzoo.org/#/boards/BGZ0000004/discussions/DGZ0002o6u
DECaLS obsdate for z band seems to be in 2015 (2015-04-07) according to Budgieye's research, so as of yet some possibilities;
-
DECaLS date is incorrect, I need to dig in the FITS files on PC to make sure
-
humongous coincidence from combo of SNe / artifacts etc.
-
variable source (that bright??)
-
Supernova imposter? (Found one before pre-confirmed, tend to flare up every now and then)
-
maybe a tad too weak to be seen in other surveys like SDSS?
-
anything else?
Posted
-
-
by c_cld
SN candidate in AGZ000dt2p SDSS J114258.95-012901.8
DATE-OBS='2013-04-06T05:47:49.549' FILTER ='g_SDSS'
DECaLS DR5 http://legacysurvey.org/viewer/?ra=175.7456&dec=-1.4841&zoom=16&layer=decals-dr5
Posted
-
by c_cld
Supernova in AGZ000e5jv SDSS J122049.14+003751.6
Date Obs (start)
VSTKIDS_i-VSTKIDS_g-VSTKIDS_u
SDSS
DECaLS
http://legacysurvey.org/viewer?ra=185.2047&dec=0.631001&zoom=16&layer=decals-dr5
Posted
-
by c_cld
Supernova in AGZ000e4a1 SDSS J121607.58+011601.6
GAMAJ121607.58+011601.5 CATAID = 273542
Date Obs (start)
VSTKIDS_i-VSTKIDS_g-VSTKIDS_u
SDSS
DECaLS
http://legacysurvey.org/viewer/?ra=184.0316&dec=1.2671&zoom=15&layer=decals-dr5
Posted
-
by c_cld
Supernova in AGZ000e4fi SDSS J120301.30+012616.7
GAMAJ120301.30+012616.8 CATAID = 272750
Date Obs (start)
VSTKIDS_r-VSTKIDS_g-VSTKIDS_u
SDSS
Posted
-
by c_cld
SN: KIDS J144002.69-013141.16 220.011227 -01.528099 rmag 19.78 (orange/ inverted blue)
http://ds.astro.rug.astro-wise.org:8000/KiDS_DR3.0_220.0_-1.5_r_sci.fits 2014-03-26T07:32:28
KiDS_DR3.0_220.0_-1.5_g_sci.fits 2014-06-30T01:31:30
AGZ000ed4s GAMAJ144002.71-013143.6
host 2dFGRS N281Z200 z 0.080166
DECaLS-DR5
2dFGRS N281Z200
Posted
-
by c_cld
Supernova in AGZ000ek8f SDSS J144452.12+002156.8
GAMAJ144452.12+002156.8 CATAID = 619737
SDSS
SN: KIDS J144452.40+002200.48 ra, dec 221.218319 +00.366799 r_mag 19.92 DATE-OBS= '2014-05-07T05:42:55'
Posted
-
by c_cld
Supernova in AGZ000ecr1 SDSS J143453.82-010813.8
GAMAJ143453.82-010813.8 CATAID = 512394
SN: KIDS J143453.86-010821.26 r_mag 18.49 obs 2013-03-9T08:50:55
SDSS
DECaLS DR5
Posted
-
by Ghost_Sheep_SWR in response to c_cld's comment.
Wow cool in GAMA KIDS AND in DECaLS, should be a lightcurve in there!! š
Also the one before the previous, what about the red object in the SDSS image?
Posted
-
by c_cld
SN: KIDS J143453.86-010821.26
Lightcurve needs some photometry measurements which are absent in DECaLS catalogs.
There seems to be a DR3 brighter red SN than on later DR5 but that's all I can say.DECaLS DR3 DECaLS DR5
Posted
-
by Ghost_Sheep_SWR in response to c_cld's comment.
establishing manual magnitudes is ofcourse possible but haven's actually went for it yet, still have a supernova lying around to get classified.
DR3 is probably wrongly scaled due to only 1 available band.
Posted
-
by c_cld
SN candidate in AGZ000eh79 SDSS J143819.76+011400.7
GAMAJ143819.76+011400.7 CATAID = 298387
SN: KIDS J143819.44+011404.34 g_mag 21.406 DATE-OBS= '2015-06-17T01:17:08'
SDSS
Posted
-
by c_cld
Supernova in AGZ000e7oj SDSS J140904.03-000520.9
GAMAJ140904.03-000520.9 CATAID = 592250
SN: KIDS J140904.18-000523.60 i_mag 20.75 OBS= 2014-03-12T04:50:56
SDSS
G592250_VSTKIDS_i_VSTKIDS_r_VSTKIDS_u
Posted
-
by c_cld
Supernova in AGZ000el26 SDSS J142211.75-000752.6
GAMAJ142211.75-000752.6 CATAID = 593117
SN: KIDS J142212.01-000750.08 215.550057 -00.130578
OBJECT = 'KIDS_216.0_-0.5' obs u 2012-04-30T05:32:08, g 2012-04-22T07:23:14 r 2012-04-22T06:04:42SDSS
Posted
-
by c_cld
Supernova in AGZ000ekbk SDSS J143337.82+001732.4
GAMAJ143337.84+001732.5 CATAID = 619152
SN : KIDS J143338.08+001732.67 ra, dec 218.408676 +00.292409 obs r_mag 2014-06-21T23:23:29.1
SDSS
Posted
-
by c_cld
Supernova in AGZ000eha8 SDSS J143223.49+011652.5
GAMAJ143223.49+011652.5 CATAID = 298046
SN : KIDS J143223.77+011648.93 ra, dec 218.099057 +01.280259 obs g_mag 2012-04-22T07:46:30.546
http://ds.astro.rug.astro-wise.org:8000/KiDS_DR1.0_218.0_1.5_g_sci.fitsSDSS
Posted
-
by Abe_Hoekstra
Bright star to the right - DECals
https://talk.galaxyzoo.org/#/boards/BGZ0000004/discussions/DGZ0002viy
also mentioned by graaahhSDSS
Posted
-
by Abe_Hoekstra
Blue star at one o'clock
https://talk.galaxyzoo.org/#/boards/BGZ0000004/discussions/DGZ0002vis
GAMA
SDSS
Posted
-
by Abe_Hoekstra
Blue object at seven o'clock
https://talk.galaxyzoo.org/#/boards/BGZ0000004/discussions/DGZ0002vir
Also in jq2uoz'supernovae? collection
GAMA
SDSS
Posted
-
by Abe_Hoekstra
Green dot to the left
Artifact? Cosmic ray hit? Supernova?
DECals
SDSS
Posted
-
by Abe_Hoekstra
https://talk.galaxyzoo.org/#/boards/BGZ0000004/discussions/DGZ0002vj0
12:16:37.42,-02:07:38.01
SDSS
Posted
-
by c_cld
Supernova SDSS J130701.94+160041.8 1237668588654231693 ra, dec 196.758090525, 16.011622399
mjd_r 53526.2680220401 i.e. 2005-06-05 06:25:57.104 UTC
host IC 848 (z) 0.053 https://dr12.sdss.org/sas/dr12/boss/photoObj/frames/301/5382/1/frame-irg-005382-1-0101.jpg
PanSTARRS-1 i/r/g 45"x45"
Posted
-
by wouterretuow
found in Galaxy Zoo 3D:the big green object at 04:00 is absent in http://legacysurvey.org/viewer?ra=251.7532&dec=39.0611&zoom=16&layer=mzls+bass-dr6 and in http://aladin.u-strasbg.fr/AladinLite/ under DSS2/blue.Posted