Galaxy Zoo Talk

(Possible) Gravitational Waves Announcement Thurs

  • Budgieye by Budgieye moderator

    Scientists are holding a news conference Thursday Feb. 11 2015 15:30 GMT)

    Astronomers may finally have found elusive gravitational waves, the
    mysterious ripples in the fabric of spacetime whose existence was
    first predicted by Albert Einstein in 1916, in his famous theory of
    general relativity.

    Scientists are holding a news conference Thursday (Feb. 11) at 10:30
    a.m. EST (1530 GMT) at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., to
    discuss the search for gravitational waves, which zoom through space
    at the speed of light.

    http://www.space.com/31869-gravitational-waves-news-conference-thursday.html

    This would be the detection of two heavy objects merging ie. two neutron stars (most likely), a neutron star and a black hole, or less likely, two black holes. The most amazing would be the
    merger of two supermassive Black Holes, such as found in the center of galaxies, but that is statistically unlikely.

    http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/02/woohoo-email-stokes-rumor-gravitational-waves-have-been-spotted

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Association with an electromagnetic detection asked to ESO:

    http://archive.eso.org/wdb/wdb/eso/approved_runs/query?tel=VST&prog_id=095.D-0195(A)&period=95&remarks=Type: ToO

    Proposal Title

    Searching for the electromagnetic counterpart of gravitational wave sources

    Night 2015 Sep 17 😃

    Posted

  • Ghost_Sheep_SWR by Ghost_Sheep_SWR

    You're cunning 😃

    Also target list:
    http://archive.eso.org/wdb/wdb/eso/eso_archive_main/query?prog_id=095.D-0195(A)&max_rows_returned=1000

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Sky localization targets in constellation Volans on Night 2015 Sep 17 (list of 108)

    from Vizier "B/eso/eso_arc" Full ESO science archive log

    http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-4?-ref=VIZ56bb00dd4814&-to=-4b&-from=-2&-this=-4&%2F%2Fsource=B%2Feso&%2F%2Ftables=B%2Feso%2Feso_arc&-out.max=200&%2F%2FCDSportal=http%3A%2F%2Fcdsportal.u-strasbg.fr%2FStoreVizierData.html&-out.form=HTML+Table&%2F%2Foutaddvalue=default&-order=I&-oc.form=sexa&-nav=cat%3AB%2Feso%26tab%3A{B%2Feso%2Feso_arc}%26key%3Asource%3DB%2Feso%26HTTPPRM%3A&-c=&-c.eq=J2000&-c.r=++2&-c.u=arcmin&-c.geom=r&-source=&-order=I&-out.src=B%2Feso%2Feso_arc&-source=B%2Feso%2Feso_arc&-order=I&-out=TelID&TelID=40&InstrID=OMEGACAM&ProgID=095.D-0195(A)&ObsTech=IMAGE%2CDITHER&-out=Obs&-out=tExp&-out=Ask&-out=Target&Target=No+name&InstMode=IMAGING&-out=RAJ2000&-out=DEJ2000&-meta.ucd=2&-meta=1&-meta.foot=1&-usenav=1&-bmark=GET

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Targeted in December 28, 2015 (list of 292 )

    http://archive.eso.org/wdb/wdb/eso/sched_rep_arc/query?progid=096.D-0110(A)

    http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-4?-ref=VIZ56bb00dd4814&-to=-4b&-from=-2&-this=-4&%2F%2Fsource=B%2Feso&%2F%2Ftables=B%2Feso%2Feso_arc&-out.max=1000&%2F%2FCDSportal=http%3A%2F%2Fcdsportal.u-strasbg.fr%2FStoreVizierData.html&-out.form=HTML+Table&%2F%2Foutaddvalue=default&-order=I&-oc.form=sexa&-nav=cat%3AB%2Feso%26tab%3A{B%2Feso%2Feso_arc}%26key%3Asource%3DB%2Feso%26HTTPPRM%3A&-c=&-c.eq=J2000&-c.r=++2&-c.u=arcmin&-c.geom=r&-source=&-order=I&-order=I&-out.src=B%2Feso%2Feso_arc&-source=B%2Feso%2Feso_arc&-order=I&-out=TelID&TelID=40&InstrID=OMEGACAM&ObsTech=IMAGE%2CDITHER&-out=Obs&Obs=>+2015-12-01&-out=tExp&-out=Ask&-out=Target&Target=No+name&InstMode=IMAGING&-out=RAJ2000&-out=DEJ2000&-meta.ucd=2&-meta=1&-meta.foot=1&-usenav=1&-bmark=GET&-meta.form=1

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Wonder what is the blue elongated object we see in http://www.worldwidetelescope.org/webclient/ near target ra,dec 08 28 22.77 -67 26 25.6 ?

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Multiple ESO observations of 08 28 22.77 -67 26 25.6

    Obs RAJ2000 DEJ2000

    2015-11-18T06:40:22 08 28 22.77 -67 26 25.6

    2015-10-03T07:45:17 08 28 22.77 -67 26 25.6

    2015-09-25T08:50:47 08 28 22.77 -67 26 25.6

    2015-09-22T09:20:59 08 28 22.77 -67 26 25.6

    2015-09-17T09:03:32 08 28 22.77 -67 26 25.6

    2015-09-18T09:10:40 08 28 22.77 -67 26 25.6

    Posted

  • Ghost_Sheep_SWR by Ghost_Sheep_SWR

    EDIT 10-02-2016

    Maybe 2 / 4 interacting objects nearby ra,dec 127.095 -67.455 / 08:28:22.800 -67:27:18.00??

    enter image description here
    enter image description here
    enter image description here
    enter image description here

    Images NED, (Edit not SDSS, but) DSS DR2 colored, red and blue

    http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/cgi-bin/objsearch?search_type=Obj_id&objid=204198408&objname=1&img_stamp=YES&hconst=73.0&omegam=0.27&omegav=0.73&corr_z=1

    http://aladin.u-strasbg.fr/AladinLite/?target=127.095-67.455&fov=0.02&survey=P/DSS2/color

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Back to Einstein's announcement 😃

    Notion of gravitation waves first published by Albert Einstein in 1916 and 1918:

    Über Gravitationswellen Jan 31, 1918

    Paper solving "Einstein's equations" by a perturbation method where the special metric is a small deviation from the Euclidean metric. There are plane wave solutions that propagate at the velocity of light in vacuum and all physical effects are transverse to the propagation.

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    https://dcc.ligo.org/public/0122/P150914/014/LIGO-P150914%3ADetection_of_GW150914.pdf

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    B. P. Abbottetal.*(LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration)

    (Received 21 January 2016; published 11 February 2016)

    On September 14, 2015 at 09:50:45 UTC the two detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-WaveObservatory simultaneously observed a transient gravitational-wave signal. The signal sweeps upwards in frequency from 35 to 250 Hz with a peak gravitational-wave strain of 1.0×10−21. It matches the waveform predicted by general relativity for the inspiral and merger of a pair of black holes and the ringdown of the resulting single black hole. The signal was observed with a matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 24 and a false alarm rate estimated to be less than 1 event per 203 000 years, equivalent to a significance greater than 5.1σ. The source lies at a luminosity distance of 410 +160−180 Mpc corresponding to a redshift z ÂŒ0.09ĂŸ 0.03−0.04.In the source frame, the initial black hole masses are 36 +5−4M⊙and 29 +4−4M⊙, and the final black hole mass is 62 +4−4M⊙,with 3.0 +0.5−0.5M⊙c2 radiated in gravitational waves. All uncertainties define 90% credible intervals.These observations demonstrate the existence of binary stellar-mass black hole systems. This is the first direct detection of gravitational waves and the first observation of a binary black hole merger.

    DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Astronomy Picture of the Day http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html

    event GW150914 event GW150914

    LIGO Detects Gravitational Waves from Merging Black Holes

    Illustration Credit: LIGO, NSF, Aurore Simonnet (Sonoma State U.)

    The featured illustration depicts the two merging black holes with the signal strength of the two detectors over 0.3 seconds superimposed across the bottom.

    Posted

  • Ghost_Sheep_SWR by Ghost_Sheep_SWR

    From space.com

    enter image description here

    The probable location of a black hole collision that spawned gravitational waves detected by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory is shown in this still from a National Science Foundation press conference in Washington, D.C. on Feb. 11, 2016. The collision occurred 1.3 billion years ago in a region of space over Earth's Southern Hemisphere, scientists say.
    Credit: National Science Foundation


    Any general coordinates known?

    Posted

  • Budgieye by Budgieye moderator

    That is a good map for the location of the event. Thanks Ghost Sheep. Somewhere around the Great Magellanic Cloud. So we won't be finding it in SDSS or DECaLS.

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld in response to Budgieye's comment.

    A far better localization map

    http://astrog80.astro.cf.ac.uk/Gravoscope/#

    Gravoscope allows you to overlay the projected possible locations of gravitational waves detected by Advanced LIGO. Use the options in the bottom left to turn them on and off. The positions cover large areas of sky because trangulation of gravitational wave signals is very difficult, and the location is only constrained to an area on the sky. The more likely regions are brighter.

    Posted

  • Ghost_Sheep_SWR by Ghost_Sheep_SWR

    Large Magellanic Cloud;

    Right ascension 05h 23m 34.5s

    Declination −69° 45â€Č 22″

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Magellanic_Cloud


    Well (ra,dec 127.095 -67.455 / 08:28:22.800 -67:27:18.00) still in the neighbourhood, 1 day for before the announcement 😃 , you're amazing c_cld

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    From LIGO

    ‏@LIGO Feb 12 Rai Weiss will give a colloquium today at 1pm EST on
    #GravitationalWaves to @NSF.

    5:55 PM - 12 Feb 2016

    Georgia, USA

    https://youtu.be/c7293kAiPZw (poor quality video recording)

    LIGO co-founder Rai Weiss talks about the complicated history of
    gravitational waves, a little about the LIGO detector and the
    discovery, and a bit about the future.

    Prof. Rai Weiss tells a little of history in which he puts the timeline of "Theorists", "Observers" and "Experimentalists" back to A.Einstein up to groups of "architects" in the 70's.

    He emphasizes the role of the "Chapel Hill meeting" but forgets to mention women.
    This big event happened in 1957 which reinvigorated studies in this GW/GR field.

    He should have excerpted from the CĂ©cile M. DeWitt's "Report from the 1957 Chapel Hill Conference"

    a quote from R. H. Dicke "we have Eddington’s view, which I may describe by saying that if we make the mathematics complicated enough, we can expect to make things fit."

    instead of R.Weiss quote about skeptical Eddington '... waves were spurious and propagate ... with the speed of thought.’

    More importantly he should have speak of the session "Solving The Initial Value Problem Using Cartan Calculus / Mme Choquet-Bruhat"
    and the discussion summarized by Misner

    “First we assume that you have a computing machine better than
    anything we have now, and many programmers and a lot of money, and you
    want to look at a nice pretty solution of the Einstein equations. The
    computer wants to know from you what are the values of gΌΜ and ∂ gΌΜ ∂
    t at some initial surface,say at t = 0. Now, if you don’t watch out
    when you specify these initial conditions, then either the programmer
    will shoot himself or the machine will blow up. In order to avoid this
    calamity you must make sure that the initial conditions which you
    prescribe are in accord with certain differential equations in their
    dependence on x,y, z at the initial time. These are what are called
    the “constraints.” They are the equations analogous to but much more
    complicated than div−→E =0. They are the equations to which we have
    been finding particular solutions; and on the other hand, Mme FourĂšs
    has shown the existence of more general kinds of solutions. Mme
    FourĂšs has told us that to get these initial conditions you must
    specify something else on a two-dimensional surface and hand over that
    problem, the problem of the initial values, to a smaller computer
    first, before you start on what Lichnerowicz called the evolutionary
    problem. The small computer would prepare the initial conditions for
    the big one. Then the theory, while not guaranteeing solutions for the
    whole future, says that it will be some finite time before anything
    blows up.”

    We might regret Prof. Reiss doesn't highlight support of solving the most complex problems in numerical relativity and relativistic astrophysics, including several groups addressing models of gravitational waves sources seen by LIGO in this discovery. 😃

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    DES searches for optical signatures of gravitational waves

    Results of analyses can be found in Soares-Santos et. al 2016 and Annis et. al 2016.

    Area covered by the DECam searches for optical counterparts of the first gravitational wave event #GW150914.

    The dotted contours show the initial (September 2015) skyprobcc cWB complete map, while the solid contours are for the ïŹnal (January 2016) LALInference skymap. The hexagonal DECam ïŹelds observed are shown, with red for the main search and orange for the short exposure LMC data. The projection shown is an equal-area McBryde-Thomas ïŹ‚at-polar quartic projection.

    Conclusions

    over the analysis region covering 3% of the total localization probability, we ïŹnd no candidate counterparts.

    ... Although these results are not surprising given the partial areal
    coverage and the likely BBH merger nature of the event, our search is
    a crucial ïŹrst step and demonstrates the viability of DECam for deep
    optical follow-up of GW events.

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    GW150914 Factsheet

    contribution of the Gravitational Physics Group at Cardiff University

    Space-time ripples detected for the very first time

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    From the The French Académie des Sciences

    L'Académie des sciences salue la naissance d'une nouvelle astronomie

    Une nouvelle fenĂȘtre s’ouvre sur l’Univers. Un siĂšcle aprĂšs leur prĂ©diction par Einstein, des ondes gravitationnelles en provenance de l’Univers lointain viennent d’ĂȘtre dĂ©tectĂ©es sur Terre, apportant pour la premiĂšre fois une preuve directe de l’existence des trous noirs.

    Depuis les annĂ©es 60, les ondes gravitationnelles faisaient l’objet de recherches intensives par la mise en Ɠuvre de dĂ©tecteurs mĂ©caniques rĂ©sonnants, puis de gigantesques interfĂ©romĂštres optiques. La rĂ©alitĂ© de la propagation par ondes de la gravitation a Ă©tĂ© Ă©tablie dans les annĂ©es 80-90, grĂące Ă  l’observation du mouvement de plusieurs pulsars binaires. Cependant, leur Ă©mission hors du systĂšme n’avait encore pu ĂȘtre dĂ©tectĂ©e. Les ondes gravitationnelles sont des dĂ©formations de l’espace-temps extraordinairement petites, qui se propagent Ă  la vitesse de la lumiĂšre. Elles proviennent de sources astrophysiques d’une puissance extrĂȘme, telle la coalescence de systĂšmes binaires d’astres trĂšs compacts comme les trous noirs ou les Ă©toiles Ă  neutrons. Fin 2015, des fluctuations, d’un facteur relatif de l’ordre de 10-21, ont Ă©tĂ© enregistrĂ©es dans la longueur des deux bras d’un interfĂ©romĂštre de Michelson muni de cavitĂ©s Fabry-PĂ©rot. Ces signaux n’ont durĂ© qu’une petite fraction de seconde, mais leur forme portait la signature de leur source : la coalescence de deux trous noirs ayant une masse de l’ordre de 30 masses solaires, et situĂ©s Ă  environ 400 Mpc (1 parsec (pc) ≈ 3,26 annĂ©es-lumiĂšre) de la Terre. Cette dĂ©couverte constitue deux grandes premiĂšres : la dĂ©tection d’ondes gravitationnelles et l’observation de la fusion de deux trous noirs, en parfait accord avec la dynamique de ces objets prĂ©dite par la relativitĂ© gĂ©nĂ©rale. Un accord qui apporte une nouvelle confirmation de la thĂ©orie d’Einstein dans un rĂ©gime encore inexplorĂ©. Ces observations de fin 2015 ont Ă©tĂ© effectuĂ©es sur les deux interfĂ©romĂštres LIGO situĂ©s aux États-Unis, appartenant au rĂ©seau international LIGO/Virgo. Ce rĂ©seau de dĂ©tecteurs est nĂ© d’une collaboration entre les États-Unis, la France et l’Italie, notamment. Six Ă©quipes françaises ont ainsi participĂ© Ă  cette dĂ©couverte qui repose, par ailleurs, sur l’utilisation d’élĂ©ments clĂ©s initiĂ©s en France : transfert de stabilitĂ© par injection, choix d’un laser YAG, modĂ©lisation optique de l’interfĂ©romĂštre, utilisation d’un « mode-cleaner », traitement optique Ă  faible perte des miroirs, algorithmes robustes de recherche de signaux inconnus transitoires, extraction des signaux gravitationnels par filtrage adaptĂ© utilisant des gabarits fondĂ©s sur la mĂ©thode EOB.
    Des Ă©tudes sont en cours pour amĂ©liorer encore la sensibilitĂ© des interfĂ©romĂštres afin d’accĂ©der Ă  un plus grand nombre de sources. Le domaine des basses et ultrabasses frĂ©quences, inaccessible sur Terre, pourra ĂȘtre couvert par d’autres dĂ©tecteurs : interfĂ©romĂštres de trĂšs grande envergure dans l’espace (eLISA), rĂ©seau de pulsars milliseconde, dispositifs d’étude de la polarisation du fond radio cosmologique, interfĂ©romĂštres Ă  ondes atomiques (Miga), etc. Une nouvelle astronomie est donc nĂ©e fin 2015, fondĂ©e non plus sur la rĂ©ception de lumiĂšre, mais sur la dĂ©tection d’ondes gravitationnelles, extrĂȘmement pĂ©nĂ©trantes, qui se caractĂ©risent par une infime dĂ©formation de l’espace-temps. L’AcadĂ©mie des sciences se fĂ©licite de cette dĂ©couverte spectaculaire et des avancĂ©es scientifiques qu’elle va engendrer.

    *Michel Davier est coauteur de la publication de la collaboration LIGO/Virgo dans la revue Physical Review Letters : PRL 116, 061102
    (2016)

    **Christian Bordé, Laboratoire de physique des lasers et Syrte-Observatoire de Paris ; Catherine Bréchignac, Secrétaire
    perpĂ©tuel de l’AcadĂ©mie des sciences, ambassadeur dĂ©lĂ©guĂ© Ă  la
    science, la technologie et l’innovation ; Yvonne Choquet-Bruhat,
    professeur Ă©mĂ©rite Ă  l’universite Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, Paris ;
    Thibault Damour, Institut des hautes Ă©tudes scientifiques ; Michel
    Davier, Laboratoire de l’AccĂ©lĂ©rateur LinĂ©aire, IN2P3/CNRS et
    Université Paris-Saclay

    Paris, le 11 février 2016

    Posted

  • Budgieye by Budgieye moderator

    Merci, c_cld

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Wednesday, February 24, 2016 : At a hearing of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, Congressman Bill Foster , the only physicist in Congress (!) discusses gravitational waves.

    https://youtu.be/NInj5FEBCvA

    Full Committee Hearing - Unlocking the Secrets of the Universe: Gravitational Waves

    Date: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 https://science.house.gov/legislation/hearings/full-committee-hearing-unlocking-secrets-universe-gravitational-waves

    Posted

  • Ghost_Sheep_SWR by Ghost_Sheep_SWR

    Possible Light Flash from Black Hole Collision Spotted

    From Space.com
    http://www.space.com/32615-black-hole-merger-gamma-ray-burst-gravitational-waves.html#sthash.MGlRHYE8.dpuf

    Any particular region from the flash known yet?

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    An improved analysis of GW150914 using a fully spin-precessing waveform model from The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration

    This paper presents updated estimates of source parameters for GW150914, a binary black-hole coalescence event detected by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) on September 14, 2015

    we quote updated component masses of

    35+5−3M⊙ and 30+3−4M⊙

    (where errors correspond to 90% symmetric credible intervals).

    one obtains parameters

    GW150914

    Previous estimate in arxiv.org/abs/1602.03840 and factsheet

    http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03840

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    To get a general understanding of the order of magnitude of the signal picked by the detectors for the chirping binary black holes in the inspiral phase let us use the characteristics of the sources.

    By the so-called "quadrupole formula" obtained by Albert Einstein in 1918, the leading order energy loss (per unit time) of a source of gravitational waves depends on the third time derivative of the moment of inertia tensor also known as the "quadrupole moment tensor".

    Using this formula and assuming a circular binary black holes source at luminosity distance D_L (440Mpc), one finds the strain amplitude h of gravitational waves measured by LIGO as:

    amplitude

    The expressions for the derivative of the frequency of GW and for the luminosity distance are:

    evolution

    Given GW150914 release data at https://losc.ligo.org/events/GW150914/
    one gets the approximation analysis exercise with simple spreadsheet :

    time strain GW frequency GW wavelength
    second (h x 10^21) Hz km
    0.26433 0.4852 36.08 8,308
    0.28026 0.4971 37.42 8,012
    0.29558 0.5100 38.89 7,709
    0.31029 0.5246 40.57 7,389
    0.32439 0.5412 42.51 7,053
    0.33782 0.5604 44.79 6,693
    0.35051 0.5825 47.47 6,316
    0.36248 0.6085 50.69 5,915
    0.37365 0.6396 54.62 5,489
    0.38396 0.6782 59.63 5,027
    0.39336 0.7273 66.23 4,527
    0.40172 0.7926 75.34 3,979
    0.40899 0.8819 88.43 3,390
    0.41497 1.0045 107.49 2,789
    0.41967 1.1503 131.74 2,276

    Plotting the time-frequency allows to clearly see the "chirp" 😃

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    (continued) Back-of-the-envelope calculation with excel sheet (to be checked)!

    Gravitational waves (GW) power radiated from binary black holes (BH/BH) system for quasi-circular orbits (inspiral waveform) averaging over polarizations

    luminosity GW

    GW150914 before merger

    timeBH orbital frequencyBHs separationBHs velocityluminosity GWluminosity GW
    secondHzkmfactor of cerg/sEM sun factor
    0.2643318.048760.332.27E+545.93E+18
    0.2802618.718550.342.56E+546.69E+18
    0.2955819.448330.342.91E+547.61E+18
    0.3102920.298100.343.35E+548.76E+18
    0.3243921.257850.353.92E+541.02E+19
    0.3378222.407580.364.67E+541.22E+19
    0.3505123.737290.365.66E+541.48E+19
    0.3624825.346980.377.05E+541.84E+19
    0.3736527.316640.389.04E+542.36E+19
    0.3839629.826260.391.21E+553.16E+19
    0.3933633.125840.411.72E+554.49E+19
    0.4017237.675360.422.64E+556.90E+19
    0.4089944.224820.454.50E+551.18E+20
    0.4149753.754230.488.63E+552.26E+20
    0.4196765.873690.511.70E+564.44E+20

    The estimated energy radiated in GWs from the sources in this inspiral segment is around 2.15×10^54 erg

    i.e.

    ~2.15×10^47 J (joules)

    ~ 1.2 × relativistic mass-energy equivalent of a solar mass ( 1 M_sun c^2 )

    ~ 2200 × energy released from a supernova (~~ 1×10^44 J )

    From reading publications by "LIGO ScientiïŹc Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration"
    , the total energy emitted in gravitational waves for GW150914 during inspiral, merger and ringdown was of the order of 5 x 10^54 erg (~ 2.8 × relativistic mass-energy equivalent of a solar mass ( 1 M_sun c^2 ) )

    (end of the orders of approximation)

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Demonstration of strain data for the inspiraling and merging BHs sources in event GW150914

    courtesy Satya Mohapatra
    "Gravitational Waves from Non-precessing Spinning Binary Black Hole Coalescence"
     http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/GravitationalWavesFromNonPrecessingSpinningBinaryBlackHoleCo/
     Wolfram Demonstrations Project

    GW150914

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    LIGO Does It Again: A Second Robust Binary Black Hole Coalescence Observed

    GW151226: A Second Confirmed Source of Gravitational Radiation

    Astronomy Picture of the Day

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    paper Binary Black Hole Mergers in the ïŹrst Advanced LIGO Observing Run

    The LIGO ScientiïŹc Collaboration and The Virgo Collaboration (15JUNE2016)

    summary W151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22 Solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    NYT Science Scientists Hear a Second Chirp From Colliding Black Holes

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Help @LIGO improve the search for gravitational waves - join the beta test of http://gravityspy.org with @the_zooniverse @gravityspyzoo

    https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/zooniverse/gravity-spy

    Posted

  • Budgieye by Budgieye moderator in response to c_cld's comment.

    Amazing! Another gravitational wave discovery so soon.

    Posted

  • ElisabethB by ElisabethB moderator

    Very exciting news ! 😄

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Demonstration of strain data for the inspiraling and merging BHs sources in event GW151226

    courtesy Satya Mohapatra "Gravitational Waves from Non-precessing Spinning Binary Black Hole Coalescence" http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/GravitationalWavesFromNonPrecessingSpinningBinaryBlackHoleCo/ Wolfram Demonstrations Project

    GW151226

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Gravitational-wave signal observed by the LIGO Hanford detector buried in the noise and processed by matching with template waveform.

    GW151226

    my plot using tutorial and data from https://losc.ligo.org/s/events/GW151226/LOSC_Event_tutorial_GW151226.html

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    LSC News
    UPDATE ON LIGO'S SECOND OBSERVING RUN

    28 January 2017 -- The second Advanced LIGO run began on November 30,
    2016 and is currently in progress. As of January 23 approximately 12 days of Hanford-Livingston coincident science data have been collected, with a scheduled break between December 22, 2016 and January 4, 2017...

    So far, 2 event candidates, identified by online analysis using a
    loose false-alarm-rate threshold of one per month, have been
    identified and shared with astronomers who have signed memoranda of
    understanding with LIGO and Virgo for observational followup. A
    thorough investigation of the data and offline analysis are in
    progress; results will be shared when available.

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    UPDATE ON LIGO'S SECOND OBSERVING RUN

    9 March 2017 -- The second Advanced LIGO run began on November 30,
    2016 and is currently in progress. As of February 23 approximately 30
    days of Hanford-Livingston coincident science data have been
    collected, with a scheduled break between December 22, 2016 and
    January 4, 2017. The average reach of the LIGO network for binary
    merger events has been around 70 Mpc for 1.4+1.4 Msun, 300 Mpc for
    10+10 Msun and 700 Mpc for 30+30 Msun mergers, with relative
    variations in time of the order of 10%.

    So far, 3 event candidates, identified by online analysis using a
    loose false-alarm-rate threshold of one per month, have been
    identified and shared with astronomers who have signed memoranda of
    understanding with LIGO and Virgo for electromagnetic followup. A
    thorough investigation of the data and offline analysis are in
    progress; results will be shared when available.

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Principal gravitational wave source SCO X-1

    Has LIGO run O2 made a detection of SCO X-1? ( a low-mass X-ray binary; the neutron star is roughly 1.4 solar masses, while the donor star is only 0.42 solar masses at 2.8 Kpc )

    Mapping the gravitational wave sky

    arXiv:1610.09391v2 Searches for continuous gravitational waves from Scorpius X-1 and XTE J1751-305 in LIGO's sixth science run from Grant Meadors et al. 28 Oct 2016 revised 23 Feb 2017

    arXiv:1612.02030v4 Directional limits on persistent gravitational waves from Advanced LIGO's first observing run from The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration , 30 Jan 2017

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    May 2017 update on LIGO's second observing run

    3 May 2017 -- The second Advanced LIGO run began on November 30, 2016 and is currently in progress. As of April 23 approximately 67 days of Hanford-Livingston coincident science data have been collected. The average reach of the LIGO network for binary merger events has been around 70 Mpc for 1.4+1.4 Msun, 300 Mpc for 10+10 Msun and 700 Mpc for 30+30 Msun mergers, with relative variations in time of the order of 10%. As of April 23, 6 triggers have been identified by the online analysis, using a loose false-alarm-rate threshold of one per month, and shared with astronomers who have signed memoranda of understanding with LIGO and Virgo for electromagnetic followup. A thorough investigation of the data and offline analysis are in progress; results will be shared when available.

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    The LIGO collaboration reports its third detection of gravitational waves coming from the merger of two black holes.

    GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaboration)
    Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 221101 – Published 1 June 2017

    Posted

  • Budgieye by Budgieye moderator

    These events seem to occur several times a year. No wonder they detected a wave only two weeks after the machine was turned on.

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Demonstration of strain data for the inspiraling and merging BHs sources in event GW170104

    courtesy Satya Mohapatra "Gravitational Waves from Non-precessing Spinning Binary Black Hole Coalescence" http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/GravitationalWavesFromNonPrecessingSpinningBinaryBlackHoleCo/ Wolfram Demonstrations Project

    GW170104

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Rumours swell over new kind of gravitational-wave sighting Author:
    Davide Castelvecchi
    Publication:
    Nature News
    Publisher:
    Nature Publishing Group
    Date:
    Aug 24, 2017
    Copyright © 2017, Rights Managed by Nature Publishing Group

    Field NGC4993 ra, dec 197.448625 -23.384028 z ~0.0093 , is 40.0 Mpc or 0.130 Gly

    http://aladin.u-strasbg.fr/AladinLite/?target=NGC4993&fov=0.1&survey=P%2FDSS2%2Fcolor

    HST proposal searches

    Rapid ToO observations of the first gravitational wave counterparts HST Proposal 14804 Andrew Levan The University of Warwick; Target: ra, dec 13 09 48.080 -23 22 53.20

    Identify the signature of neutron star mergers through rapid Chandra/Hubble observations of a short GRB HST Proposal 14850 Eleonora Troja University of Maryland; Target ra, dec 13 09 48.090 -23 22 53.35

    Verifying a candidate counterpart to gravitational waves HST Proposal 15346 Mansi Kasliwal California Institute of Technology; Target ra, dec 13 09 48.089 -23 22 53.35

    UV Spectroscopy of GRB170817A HST Proposal 15382 Matt Nicholl Harvard University; Target BNS-MERGER ra, dec 13 09 48.090 -23 22 53.35

    Chandra observation : ObsDate
    2017-08-19T17:28:27s Target SGRB170817A

    The Chandra Archive Log http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-5?-ref=VIZ59a5465d5fde&-out.add=.&-source=B/chandra/chandra&recno=16204
    TOO target of opportunity, Category of the observed target BH AND NS BINARIES

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    HST Observation on 2017-04-28 03:40:
    Schedule Gap Pilot
    HST Proposal 14840 Andrea Bellini Space Telescope Science Institute

    NGC4993 shows Dust Dust ... (post merger? )

    NGC4993

    NGC4993

    NGC4993

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Second Chandra Observation scheduled for GRB170817A in ( NGC4993 RA: 13 09 47.71, Dec: -23 23 01.79 ) (Search )

    Proposal Title: Bringing Gravitational Wave Astronomy to Light: Chandra X-ray Localization of LIGO-Virgo GW Sources

    Proposal Number: 18400410

    Principal Investigator: Daryl Haggard

    | Obs ID | Instrument | Grating | Appr Exp | Target Name | PI Name | RA          | DEC          | Status    | Start Date    | Proposal | Type | Obs Cycle | Science Category   |
    |--------|------------|---------|----------|-------------|---------|-------------|--------------|-----------|---------------|----------|------|-----------|--------------------|
    | 18988  | ACIS-S     | NONE    | 50       | GRB170817A  | Haggard | 13 09 48.27 | -23 23 04.30 | scheduled | 9/2/2017 4:29 | 18400410 | TOO  | 18        | BH AND NS BINARIES |

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    GW170814: A THREE-DETECTOR OBSERVATION OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM A BINARY BLACK HOLE COALESCENCE

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    GW170814:

    GW170814

    Top row: Signal-to-noise ratio as a function of time. The peaks occur at different times in different detectors because gravitational waves propagate at the finite speed of light; this causes the signal to reach the detectors at different times. GW170814 arrived first in LIGO-Livingston, then 8 ms later in LIGO-Hanford and 6 ms after that in Virgo. Middle row: Time-frequency representation of the strain data. The brighter a given pixel in any of the three 2D-maps, the larger the signal at this particular time and frequency with respect to the expected noise level. Note the characteristic "chirp" pattern of increasing frequency with time. Bottom row: Strain time series with the best waveforms selected by the matched filtering (black solid curves) and unmodeled search methods (gray bands) superimposed.

    GW170814

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    More expected announcements of results to be confirmed at International Astronomical Union 2017 Symposium

    This symposium will bring to light the latest results available in gravitational-wave astronomy, progress in multi-messenger astronomy, and the inferences that can be made from joint observations, to open a new window to the cosmos.

    Gravitational Wave Astrophysics

    Early Results from GW Searches and Electromagnetic Counterparts
    Monday, October 16 – Thursday, October 19, 2017
    Crowne Plaza, Baton Rouge, Louisiana

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    http://hubblesite.org/news_release/news/2017-41

    Compass Image for Gravitational Wave Source in NGC 4993

    GW170817

    Posted

  • Budgieye by Budgieye moderator in response to c_cld's comment.

    Amazing information thank you for posting. I will wait for the spectrum of the colliding neutron stars!

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    VLT/MUSE image of the galaxy NGC 4993 and associated kilonova

    NGC4993 RA: 13 9 47.78
    Dec: -23° 22' 57.04"
    Field of view: 0.91 x 0.85 arcminutes
    Orientation: North is -0.0° left of vertical

    This image from the MUSE instrument on ESO’s Very Large Telescope at the Paranal Observatory in Chile shows the galaxy NGC 4993, about 130 million light-years from Earth. The galaxy is not itself unusual, but it contains something never before witnessed, the aftermath of the explosion of a pair of merging neutron stars, a rare event called a kilonova (seen just above and slightly to the left of the centre of the galaxy). This merger also produced gravitational waves and gamma rays, both of which were detected by LIGO-Virgo and Fermi/INTEGRAL respectively. By also creating a spectrum for each part of the object MUSE allows the emission from glowing gas to be seen, which appears in red here and reveals a surprising spiral structure.

    Credit:
    ESO/J.D. Lyman, A.J. Levan, N.R. Tanvir

    Posted

  • Budgieye by Budgieye moderator in response to c_cld's comment.

    Surely this emission nebula has been here long before the kilonova erupted?

    EDIT ooops, image is of the center of the galaxy? confusing.

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Kilonova AT 2017gfo

    the transient was R.A. (2000) = 13:09:48.09, decl.(2000) = −23:22:53.3, approximately 10″ from the center of the S0 galaxy NGC 4993

    https://wis-tns.weizmann.ac.il/object/2017gfo

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld in response to Budgieye's comment.

    From MUSE imaging the "red gas" sits along the dust lanes of S0 NGC4993 as it's shown in

    The science paper by A.J. Levan et al. (Astrophysical Journal Letters)

    GW170817

    Figure 1. Imaging of the host galaxy of GW170817 with HST. The left panel shows the galaxy observed in the IR with F110W and F160W, where the counterpart is marked with a circle. The top right panel shows the zoomed-in region observed with WFC3/UVIS, demonstrated the presence of strong dust lanes in the inner regions. The bottom right panel shows the same image, but with the MUSE contours in the [N ii] line superimposed, showing the strong spiral features that only appear in the emission lines. Some of these features appear to trace the dust lanes.

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    GW170608: another binary black hole merger

    GW170608: Observation of a 19-solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence arXiv:1711.05578 (Submitted on 15 Nov 2017)

    On June 8, 2017 at 02:01:16.49 UTC, a gravitational-wave signal from the merger of two stellar-mass black holes was observed by the two Advanced LIGO detectors with a network signal-to-noise ratio of 13. This system is the lightest black hole binary so far observed, with component masses $12^{+7}{-2},M\odot$ and $7^{+2}{-2},M\odot$ (90% credible intervals). These lie in the range of measured black hole masses in low-mass X-ray binaries, thus allowing us to compare black holes detected through gravitational waves with electromagnetic observations. The source's luminosity distance is 340+140−140 Mpc, corresponding to redshift 0.07+0.03−0.03. We verify that the signal waveform is consistent with the predictions of general relativity.

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Black holes gravitational waves events

    entropy-increasing process

    estimates

    +-----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+
    | GW event  | Mass 1 | Mass 2 | Mass remnant | Spin | entropy increase |
    +-----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+
    | GW150914  | 35.4   | 29.8   | 62.2         | 0.68 | 1.57             |
    +-----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+
    | LVT151012 | 23     | 13     | 35           | 0.66 | 1.54             |
    +-----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+
    | GW151226  | 14.2   | 7.5    | 20.8         | 0.74 | 1.40             |
    +-----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+
    | GW170104  | 31.2   | 19.4   | 48.7         | 0.64 | 1.55             |
    +-----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+
    | GW170608  | 12     | 7      | 18           | 0.69 | 1.45             |
    +-----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+
    | GW170814  | 30.5   | 25.3   | 53.2         | 0.7  | 1.54             |
    +-----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+
    

    The entropy increase is the ratio of the event horizon area of the final black hole to the sum of the event horizon areas of the binary components

    [edit] My calculated entropy increase is a numerical application of "Bekenstein-Hawking entropy" article

    Assuming the two progenitor black holes to be Schwarzschild black hole,
    each has its horizon's radius

    radius

    and area given by

    area

    The total "Schwarzschild" area is

    sum_area

    The end product of the coalescence is a Kerr black hole, which is fully described by its mass M and spin J.

    The horizon lies at the fixed radial coordinate

    radius

    The horizon area is given by

    Kerrarea

    Therefore the increase factor of entropy is

    enter image description here

    which is tabulated above for the known GW events where we used

    spin

    as dimensionless Spin given in factsheets published.

    Uncertanties propagation could be done to confirm the increase order of magnitude.

    (to be reviewed by curator/scholar)


    Since the approximate value of increases are curiously close and tantalizingly simple, one wonders this is accidental or quite sensible?

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Cross-refers to Observational tests of the black hole area increase law arXiv:1711.09073v1 [gr-qc] 24 Nov 2017 from Miriam Cabero, Collin D. Capano, Ofek Fischer-Birnholtz, et al.

    The black hole area theorem implies that when two black holes merge, the area of the final black hole should be greater than the sum of the areas of the two original black holes. We examine how this prediction can be tested with gravitational-wave observations of binary black holes. By separately fitting the early inspiral and final ringdown phases, we calculate the posterior distributions for the masses and spins of the two initial and the final black holes. This yields posterior distributions for the change in the area and thus a statistical test of the validity of the area increase law. We illustrate this method with a GW150914-like binary black hole waveform calculated using numerical relativity and detector sensitivities representative of both the first observational run and the design configuration of Advanced LIGO. We find that the area theorem could be confirmed to ∌66% confidence with current sensitivity, improving to ∌97% when Advanced LIGO reaches design sensitivity. An important ingredient in our test is a method of estimating when the post-merger signal is well-fit by a damped sinusoid ringdown waveform.


    Test of the Second Law of Black Hole Thermodynamics with the LIGO event GW150914 Unnikrishnan. C. S. , (Dated: 11 February 2016: Tribute to J. D. Bekenstein (1947-2015))

    Abstract
    The recent LIGO discovery of the binary black holes merging and forming a single Kerr black hole provides the first and unique opportunity to test the black hole area-entropy theorem or the second law of black hole thermodynamics. We discuss the test of the entropy law using the mass and spin estimates from the LIGO event GW150914. Because both the initial and final states consist only of black holes with high entropy and coherent gravitational waves with very low entropy, the test is essentially geometrical and ideal. However, the precision and the test itself are limited by interdependencies and errors in parameter estimation. Future studies on similar BBH events are critical precision tests of black hole area-entropy theorem

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    full results of advanced-detector observing runs (O1 and O2) arXiv:1811.12907v1 [astro-ph.HE] 30 Nov 2018

    GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs

    update on Bekenstein-Hawking entropy quantities

    +----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+------------+
    | GW event | Mass 1 | Mass 2 | Mass remnant | Spin | entropy increase | efficiency |
    +----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+------------+
    | GW150914 | 35.6   | 30.6   | 63.1         | 0.69 | 1.56             | 4.68%      |
    +----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+------------+
    | GW151012 | 23.3   | 13.6   | 35.7         | 0.67 | 1.53             | 3.25%      |
    +----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+------------+
    | GW151226 | 13.7   | 7.7    | 20.5         | 0.74 | 1.42             | 4.21%      |
    +----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+------------+
    | GW170104 | 31     | 20.1   | 49.1         | 0.66 | 1.55             | 3.91%      |
    +----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+------------+
    | GW170608 | 10.9   | 7.6    | 17.8         | 0.69 | 1.55             | 3.78%      |
    +----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+------------+
    | GW170729 | 50.6   | 34.3   | 80.3         | 0.81 | 1.37             | 5.42%      |
    +----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+------------+
    | GW170809 | 35.2   | 23.8   | 56.4         | 0.7  | 1.51             | 4.41%      |
    +----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+------------+
    | GW170814 | 30.7   | 25.3   | 53.4         | 0.72 | 1.53             | 4.64%      |
    +----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+------------+
    | GW170818 | 35.5   | 26.8   | 59.8         | 0.67 | 1.57             | 4.01%      |
    +----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+------------+
    | GW170823 | 39.6   | 29.4   | 65.6         | 0.71 | 1.51             | 4.93%      |
    +----------+--------+--------+--------------+------+------------------+------------+

    Posted

  • c_cld by c_cld

    Twin LIGO/Virgo Detections of a Viable Gravitationally-Lensed Black Hole Merger arXiv:1901.03190 From Tom Broadhurst, Jose M. Diego, George F. Smoot III

    (Submitted on 10 Jan 2019)

    We identify a binary black hole (BBH) merger that appears to be
    multiply lensed by an intervening galaxy. The LIGO/Virgo events
    GW170809 and GW170814 have indistinguishable waveforms separated by 5
    days, and overlap on the sky within the 90% credible region. Their
    strain amplitudes are also similar, implying a modest relative
    magnification ratio, as expected for a pair of lensed gravitational
    waves. The phase of the two events is also consistent with being the
    same, adding more evidence in support of both events originating from
    the same BBH merger. The difference in the published inferred
    distances of each event can then be interpreted as following from
    their different magnifications. The observed chirp masses of both
    events are also similar, as expected for a pair of lensed events, with
    a common detected value of 29.1+1.3−1.0M⊙, lying at the peak of the
    observed distribution of chirp masses. We infer this case is a
    prototypical example of a lensed event that supports our lensing
    prediction \cite{Broadhurst2018} according to which, cosmologically
    distant, magnified BBH comprise most of the LIGO/Virgo events with
    chirp masses enhanced above ≃15M⊙ by the cosmological expansion. From
    our predictions we estimate an intrinsic, unlensed, chirp mass of
    ≃10−12M⊙, with a source redshift in the range 0.9 < z < 2.5. We also
    outline a joint analysis over all baseline permutations that can
    stringently test our lensing interpretation of these two events. More
    generally, lensed events effectively multiply the number of baseline
    permutations and motivates the use of more interferometers for round
    the clock coverage of all repeat events of a given source, in order to
    maximise the orbital details and sky localization of lensed BBH
    sources.

    Posted