Subject: AGZ000bgkq

Full subject data (JSON)

Comments

• by williamaskew

  ????????????? It just doesnt look star like to me

  Posted February 16, 2016 8:40 PM

• by ElisabethB moderator

  If I would get this one to classify, I'd mark it as star/artifact and move on. And maybe I would miss an amazing discovery (or not) ! 😄

  Posted February 16, 2016 8:58 PM

• by ElisabethB moderator

  Anyway, #wrong_size

  Posted February 16, 2016 8:58 PM

• by Budgieye moderator

  yeah, I think star too. see it in DECaLS dr 2

  Posted February 16, 2016 9:49 PM

• by Budgieye moderator

  http://b.legacysurvey.org/viewer/decals-dr2/2/15/621/16360.jpg

  Posted February 16, 2016 9:52 PM

• by Ghost_Sheep_SWR

  Or is it? 😃 http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=%408667495&Name=DEEP2-GRS 33039828&submit=submit

  Posted February 16, 2016 10:14 PM

• by Ghost_Sheep_SWR

  Well, you're right about surprises EB 😃 DEEP2-GRS 33039828 - Galaxy, z=0.912 i'll try calculating size later for practice

  Posted February 17, 2016 11:58 AM

• by williamaskew

  Its amazing what DECaLS can pick up

  Posted February 17, 2016 5:48 PM

• by Budgieye moderator

  The SIMBAD object may be the blue area on the bottom left of the orange star. Blue area is 3.88 arc seconds away from the centre object.

  Posted February 17, 2016 9:05 PM

• by Budgieye moderator

  Galaxies of z=0.9 are hardly visible in SDSS. If that the red object is a galaxy, I would say that it is 0.6.

  Posted February 17, 2016 9:07 PM

• by Budgieye moderator

  But I can't seem to get the Hubble image from AEGIS. http://tkserver.keck.hawaii.edu/egs/dataAccess/query/egs_query_deep2.php

  Posted February 17, 2016 9:09 PM

• by vrooje admin, scientist

  Worth trying MAST?
  https://archive.stsci.edu - Not sure I'm seeing obviously matching images though.

  Posted February 18, 2016 10:15 PM