Galaxy Zoo Talk
If you referred to the red object IMHO is a star
IMHO Barred galaxy and also possible ring
IMHO Star
Star of our Galaxy
IMHO is an overlap but of a star. No overlapping galaxies
According to redshift it'a a very distant Galaxy.
Hard to say the Z value are 0.090518 and 0.096726 so could be an overlap
It's a satellite trail
the central object IMHO is ab elliptical galaxy. The right object is a star or pur Galaxy
It's an artifact.
It's a star of our Galaxy
It's stars from our Galaxy. It's artifacts
No Planet. IMHO it's a star of our Galaxy
It's a star. The color are false. Artifact
IMHO #overlap but I have the incurable overlapping syndrome
No merger the object on the left is a star
IMHO no edge on
The spike is not relative to a galaxy but it's an artifact generated by a star of our Galaxy
IMHO Overlap overlap ... overlap ... overlap Sorry is the overlapping syndrome (incurable)
yes but you need to classify only the central object
IMHO the starbust is a star of our Galaxy
Yes for me with 2 arms
IMHO #spiral @bar
IMHO #ring
IMHO no spiral. There is also an #overlap
As said by ElisabethB the object is a star of our Galaxy. The brightness of the star made this kind of artifact that is not real
No merger IMHO #overlap
IMHO no merger #overlap
#irregular
IMHO #overlap
yes is a star
#overlap
IMHO #irregular
It's an artifact created from an error in the images.
The big one is a star but right above, in the center of image, there is a galaxy
The object are different some stars of our Galaxy and some galaxies
Unfortunately this is a star.
Yes, the object in the upper left corner is a star but you have to classify the image in the center of image
No merging. The foreground object is a star of our Galaxy
IMHO star. Effect is created by error in the image composition.
#elliptical IMHO
IMHO this are stars of our Galaxy.
The blue one is a star of our Galaxy. The red one could be an #overlap
yes for me. overlap ... overlap ... overlap ...
Yes. The overlapping object is a star of our Galaxy
IMHO #elliptical
IMHO is due to the high luminosity of the center
IMHO is just the artifacy created from the overlap of two different shot
IMHO only an artifact
No merger IMHO. The overlapping object are stars of our galaxies #nomerger
Very little overlapping part.#notoverlap
Look the same in SDSS but with different ra 150,19163 and dec 2,32783. Probably some differences in the time reference. I'm still searching
According to the redshift #overlap. IMHO
IMHO just one spiral galaxy with 2 arms.
IMHO No fusion according to z value
IMHO no merger
IMHO #overlap according to redshift
According to SDSS the second core is a star
No merger for me according to z value. IMHO
The explanation IMHO is that the image are composed by two different exposition and the object are just in the middle.
According to z value IMHO #overlap.
graham d I believe you have overlapping syndrome too.
#overlap for me too.
Hard to say. The redshift value appear the same but I believe due to the vicinity of the objects. Could be #overlap
Yes for also for me.
No disturbed for me. I believe there is a possible overlapping galaxies. #overlap overlap ... overlap ... overlap
Yes.If I'm not wrong according to redshift it's an #overlap, but I have an incurable syndrome for overlap. overlap ... overlap ... overlap
It's an artifact. GO to this link for a better view http://skyserver.sdss3.org/dr8/en/tools/chart/navi.asp?ra=25.42688118&dec=21.14941994
According to redshift this could be #overlap
Yes for me. If you zooming out in SkyServer you can see the whole image
Absolutely overlap. overlap ... overlap ... overlap
I believe it's only overlapping galaxies. No lense for me. overlap ... overlap ... overlap ...
If you referred to the red object IMHO is a star
IMHO Barred galaxy and also possible ring
IMHO Star
Star of our Galaxy
IMHO is an overlap but of a star. No overlapping galaxies
According to redshift it'a a very distant Galaxy.
Hard to say the Z value are 0.090518 and 0.096726 so could be an overlap
It's a satellite trail
the central object IMHO is ab elliptical galaxy. The right object is a star or pur Galaxy
It's an artifact.
It's a satellite trail
It's a star of our Galaxy
It's stars from our Galaxy. It's artifacts
No Planet. IMHO it's a star of our Galaxy
It's a satellite trail
It's a satellite trail
It's a star. The color are false. Artifact
It's a satellite trail
IMHO #overlap but I have the incurable overlapping syndrome
No merger the object on the left is a star
IMHO no edge on
The spike is not relative to a galaxy but it's an artifact generated by a star of our Galaxy
IMHO Overlap
overlap ... overlap ... overlap
Sorry is the overlapping syndrome (incurable)
yes but you need to classify only the central object
IMHO the starbust is a star of our Galaxy
Yes for me with 2 arms
IMHO #spiral @bar
IMHO #ring
IMHO no spiral. There is also an #overlap
As said by ElisabethB the object is a star of our Galaxy. The brightness of the star made this kind of artifact that is not real
No merger IMHO #overlap
IMHO no merger #overlap
#irregular
IMHO #overlap
yes is a star
#irregular
#overlap
IMHO #irregular
It's an artifact created from an error in the images.
The big one is a star but right above, in the center of image, there is a galaxy
The object are different some stars of our Galaxy and some galaxies
IMHO #irregular
Unfortunately this is a star.
Yes, the object in the upper left corner is a star but you have to classify the image in the center of image
No merging. The foreground object is a star of our Galaxy
IMHO star. Effect is created by error in the image composition.
#elliptical IMHO
IMHO this are stars of our Galaxy.
The blue one is a star of our Galaxy.
The red one could be an #overlap
yes for me.
overlap ... overlap ... overlap ...
Yes. The overlapping object is a star of our Galaxy
IMHO #elliptical
IMHO is due to the high luminosity of the center
IMHO is just the artifacy created from the overlap of two different shot
IMHO only an artifact
No merger IMHO. The overlapping object are stars of our galaxies
#nomerger
It's a satellite trail
Very little overlapping part.#notoverlap
Look the same in SDSS but with different ra 150,19163 and dec 2,32783. Probably some differences in the time reference.
I'm still searching
According to the redshift #overlap. IMHO
IMHO just one spiral galaxy with 2 arms.
IMHO No fusion according to z value
IMHO no merger
IMHO #overlap according to redshift
According to SDSS the second core is a star
No merger for me according to z value. IMHO
The explanation IMHO is that the image are composed by two different exposition and the object are just in the middle.
According to z value IMHO #overlap.
graham d I believe you have overlapping syndrome too.
#overlap for me too.
Hard to say. The redshift value appear the same but I believe due to the vicinity of the objects. Could be #overlap
Yes for also for me.
No disturbed for me. I believe there is a possible overlapping galaxies.
#overlap
overlap ... overlap ... overlap
Yes.If I'm not wrong according to redshift it's an #overlap, but I have an incurable syndrome for overlap.
overlap ... overlap ... overlap
It's an artifact. GO to this link for a better view http://skyserver.sdss3.org/dr8/en/tools/chart/navi.asp?ra=25.42688118&dec=21.14941994
According to redshift this could be #overlap
Yes for me. If you zooming out in SkyServer you can see the whole image
Absolutely overlap.
overlap ... overlap ... overlap
I believe it's only overlapping galaxies. No lense for me.
overlap ... overlap ... overlap ...